Abstract An experimental study of a spiral counterflow “Swiss roll” burner was conducted, with emphasis on the determination of extinction limits and comparison of results with and without bare-metal Pt catalyst. A wide range of Reynolds numbers ( Re ) were tested using propane–air mixtures. Both lean and rich extinction limits were extended with the catalyst, though rich limits were extended much further. With the catalyst, combustion could be sustained at Re as low as 1.2 with peak temperatures as low as 350 K. A heat transfer parameter characterizing the thermal performance of both gas-phase and catalytic combustion at all Re was identified. At low Re , the “lean” extinction limit was actually rich of stoichiometric, and rich-limit had equivalence ratios exceeded 40 in some cases. No corresponding behavior was observed without the catalyst. Gas-phase combustion, in general, occurred in a “flameless” mode near the burner center. With or without catalyst, for sufficiently robust conditions (high Re , near-stoichiometric) not requiring heat recirculation, a visible flame would propagate out of the center, but this flame could only be re-centered if the catalyst were present. Gas chromatography indicated that at low Re , even in extremely rich mixtures, CO and non-propane hydrocarbons did not form. For higher Re , where both gas-phase and catalytic combustion could occur, catalytic limits were slightly broader but had much lower limit temperatures. At sufficiently high Re , catalytic and gas-phase limits merged. It is concluded that combustion at low Re in heat-recirculating burners greatly benefits from catalytic combustion with the proper choice of mixtures that are different from those preferred for gas-phase combustion. In particular, the importance of providing a reducing environment for the catalyst to enhance O 2 desorption, especially at low Re where heat losses are severe thus peak temperatures are low, is noted.
[1]
F. Weinberg,et al.
Limits to energy release and utilisation from chemical fuels
,
1975,
Nature.
[2]
F. Weinberg,et al.
A burner for mixtures of very low heat content
,
1974,
Nature.
[3]
J. Wunning,et al.
Flameless oxidation to reduce thermal no-formation
,
1997
.
[4]
R. Yetter,et al.
Development of a microreactor as a thermal source for microelectromechanical systems power generation
,
2002
.
[5]
A. Carlos Fernandez-Pello,et al.
Micropower generation using combustion: Issues and approaches
,
2002
.
[6]
Frank Behrendt,et al.
NUMERICAL MODELING OF CATALYTIC IGNITION
,
1996
.
[7]
P. Ronney.
Analysis of non-adiabatic heat-recirculating combustors
,
2003
.
[8]
Yiguang Ju,et al.
An analysis of sub-limit flame dynamics using opposite propagating flames in mesoscale channels
,
2003
.
[9]
O. Deutschmann,et al.
Extinction limits of catalytic combustion in microchannels
,
2002
.
[10]
K. Maruta,et al.
Reaction zone structure in flameless combustion
,
2000
.
[11]
Lance L. Smith,et al.
Catalytic combustion over platinum group catalysts: fuel-lean versus fuel-rich operation
,
2003
.
[12]
Felix Jiri Weinberg,et al.
Combustion in heat exchangers
,
1978,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[13]
Masashi Katsuki,et al.
The science and technology of combustion in highly preheated air
,
1998
.
[14]
D. G. Norton,et al.
Combustion characteristics and flame stability at the microscale: a CFD study of premixed methane/air mixtures
,
2003
.