Evolution of directional hearing in moths via conversion of bat detection devices to asymmetric pressure gradient receivers

Significance In most acoustic animals, directional hearing evolved alongside basic ear structure. Pyraloid moths differ because their ears generally function as simple bat detectors with little directional ability. Those pyraloid moths that broadcast mating calls represent a yet more special case, as these species localize sound but the ability evolved well after hearing and may be constrained by fundamental auditory features. Analyzing a species with male calling songs, we report a localization mechanism wherein the membrane structure of each ear affords sharp sensitivity to sound arriving from a distinct angle. Females can thereby track male calls but only via an indirect, curvilinear trajectory. Such inefficiency may characterize specialized perceptual traits that rely on general ones having already undergone extensive prior evolution. Small animals typically localize sound sources by means of complex internal connections and baffles that effectively increase time or intensity differences between the two ears. However, some miniature acoustic species achieve directional hearing without such devices, indicating that other mechanisms have evolved. Using 3D laser vibrometry to measure tympanum deflection, we show that female lesser waxmoths (Achroia grisella) can orient toward the 100-kHz male song, because each ear functions independently as an asymmetric pressure gradient receiver that responds sharply to high-frequency sound arriving from an azimuth angle 30° contralateral to the animal's midline. We found that females presented with a song stimulus while running on a locomotion compensation sphere follow a trajectory 20°–40° to the left or right of the stimulus heading but not directly toward it, movement consistent with the tympanum deflections and suggestive of a monaural mechanism of auditory tracking. Moreover, females losing their track typically regain it by auditory scanning—sudden, wide deviations in their heading—and females initially facing away from the stimulus quickly change their general heading toward it, orientation indicating superior ability to resolve the front–rear ambiguity in source location. X-ray computer-aided tomography (CT) scans of the moths did not reveal any internal coupling between the two ears, confirming that an acoustic insect can localize a sound source based solely on the distinct features of each ear.

[1]  B. Hedwig,et al.  Hyperacute Directional Hearing and Phonotactic Steering in the Cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus deGeer) , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  Diana Adler,et al.  The Lepidoptera Form Function And Diversity , 2016 .

[3]  A. Ewing,et al.  Arthropod Bioacoustics: Neurobiology and Behaviour , 1989 .

[4]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Risk trading in mating behavior: forgoing anti-predator responses reduces the likelihood of missing terminal mating opportunities , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  D. Robert,et al.  Mechanics of a `simple' ear: tympanal vibrations in noctuid moths , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  K. D. Roeder Aspects of the noctuid tympanic nerve response having significance in the avoidance of bats , 1964 .

[7]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Genetic architecture of sensory exploitation: QTL mapping of female and male receiver traits in an acoustic moth , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[8]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Directional hearing: from biophysical binaural cues to directional hearing outdoors , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  Andrew C. Mason,et al.  Hyperacute directional hearing in a microscale auditory system , 2001, Nature.

[10]  Ryan Calsbeek,et al.  The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology , 2013 .

[11]  M. Holderied,et al.  An Aerial-Hawking Bat Uses Stealth Echolocation to Counter Moth Hearing , 2010, Current Biology.

[12]  William J. Bell,et al.  Acoustic orientation via sequential comparison in an ultrasonic moth , 2002, Naturwissenschaften.

[13]  W. Conner,et al.  Sound strategies: the 65-million-year-old battle between bats and insects. , 2012, Annual review of entomology.

[14]  J. Fullard,et al.  Ultrasonic hearing in nocturnal butterflies , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Yukio Ishikawa,et al.  Moths produce extremely quiet ultrasonic courtship songs by rubbing specialized scales , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  F L Wightman,et al.  Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Economics of mate choice at leks: do female waxmoths pay costs for indirect genetic benefits? , 2010 .

[18]  N. Fletcher,et al.  Acoustic systems in biology , 1992 .

[19]  A. Pierce Basic Linear Acoustics , 2014 .

[20]  Michael D Greenfield Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Insects , 2016 .

[21]  J. Fullard,et al.  The evolutionary biology of insect hearing. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  J. Fullard Auditory changes in noctuid moths endemic to a bat‐free habitat , 1994 .

[23]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Evolution of ultrasonic signalling in wax moths: discrimination of ultrasonic mating calls from bat echolocation signals and the exploitation of an antipredator receiver bias by sexual advertisement , 2000 .

[24]  Richard L. Brown,et al.  Bat predation and flight timing of winter moths, Epirrita and Operophtera species (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) , 1999 .

[25]  M. J. Scoble,et al.  The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity , 1992 .

[26]  R. Hoy The Evolution of Hearing in Insects as an Adaptation to Predation from Bats , 1992 .

[27]  K. D. Roeder The behaviour of free flying moths in the presence of artificial ultrasonic pulses , 1962 .

[28]  K. D. Roeder,et al.  Directional sensitivity of the ears of noctuid moths. , 1966, The Journal of experimental biology.

[29]  I. Valterová,et al.  Simple ears - flexible behavior: Information processing in the moth auditory pathway , 2015 .

[30]  Bart R. H. Geurten,et al.  Sound Communication in Drosophila , 2014 .

[31]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Behavioural context regulates dual function of ultrasonic hearing in lesser waxmoths: bat avoidance and pair formation , 2004 .

[32]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Bat predation and the evolution of leks in acoustic moths , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  Simon Whiteley An engineering study into the bisonar system of fruitbats in the genus rousettus , 2013 .

[34]  H. R. Agee Response of Flying Bollworm Moths and Other Tympanate Moths to Pulsed Ultrasound , 1969 .

[35]  Extremely high frequency sensitivity in a ‘simple’ ear , 2013, Biology Letters.

[36]  A. Surlykke Hearing in Notodontid Moths: a Tympanic Organ with a Single Auditory Neurone , 1984 .

[37]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Ultrasonic communication and sexual selection in wax moths: female choice based on energy and asynchrony of male signals , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  Independence of Sexual and Anti‐Predator Perceptual Functions in an Acoustic Moth: Implications for the Receiver Bias Mechanism in Signal Evolution , 2009 .

[39]  Axel Michelsen,et al.  Hearing and Sound Communication in Small Animals: Evolutionary Adaptations to the Laws of Physics , 1992 .

[40]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Reproductive Behaviour of the Lesser Waxmoth, Achroia Grisella (Pyralidae: Galleriinae): Signalling, Pair Formation, Male Interactions, and Mate Guarding , 1983 .

[41]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Physics of directional hearing in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[42]  M. Engin,et al.  Path planning of line follower robot , 2012, 2012 5th European DSP Education and Research Conference (EDERC).

[43]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth , 1984 .

[44]  Michael D Greenfield Acoustic Communication in the Nocturnal Lepidoptera , 2014 .

[45]  A. Surlykke,et al.  Hearing and evasive behaviour in the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella (Pyralidae) , 2000 .

[46]  B. Hedwig Insect Hearing and Acoustic Communication , 2014, Animal Signals and Communication.

[47]  Michael D Greenfield Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication , 2002 .

[48]  Martin C Göpfert,et al.  Novel schemes for hearing and orientation in insects , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[49]  Brad A. Chadwell,et al.  Moth tails divert bat attack: Evolution of acoustic deflection , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Daniel Robert,et al.  Directional hearing in insects , 2005 .

[51]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  The contribution of tympanic transmission to fine temporal signal evaluation in an ultrasonic moth , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[52]  M. H. Marhaban,et al.  Vision-based system for line following mobile robot , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications.

[53]  Hearing and evasive behaviour in the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella (Pyralidae) , 2000 .