Trading power instead of energy in day-ahead electricity markets

Day-ahead electricity markets are inefficient due to their coarse discretisation of time and their representation of electricity production and consumption in energy per time interval. This leads to excessive costs and infeasible schedules in the market clearing results. Some real-world systems have increased the resolution to improve accuracy, but this comes at a high computational cost. We propose an alternative, based on using linear power trajectories in the day-ahead scheduling process, which represent the momentary electricity production. Changing from a traditional energy-based to such a power-based formulation of the scheduling method can reduce cost by several percentage points, leading to a cost reduction of millions of euros in real-world systems on a yearly basis. Attempting to do so by increasing the resolution of the schedule would be accompanied by large increases in computational demands. Furthermore, we provide market design options to implement power-based bidding and pricing in day-ahead electricity markets, showing that pricing and market rules which encompass existing markets are readily available for implementation, and illustrate these with examples.

[1]  Rens Philipsen,et al.  Imperfect Unit Commitment decisions with perfect information: A real-time comparison of energy versus power , 2016, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[2]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  Intraday Markets for Power: Discretizing the Continuous Trading? , 2016 .

[3]  F. Kunz,et al.  Current and Prospective Costs of Electricity Generation until 2050 , 2013 .

[4]  Claudio Gentile,et al.  A tight MIP formulation of the unit commitment problem with start-up and shut-down constraints , 2017, EURO J. Comput. Optim..

[5]  Juan P. Ruiz,et al.  Stochastic unit commitment with sub-hourly dispatch constraints , 2013 .

[6]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Sylvain Quoilin,et al.  Dispa-SET 2.0: unit commitment and power dispatch model , 2014 .

[8]  M. Satterthwaite,et al.  Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading , 1983 .

[9]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[10]  Pandelis N. Biskas,et al.  Multiple Time Resolution Unit Commitment for Short-Term Operations Scheduling Under High Renewable Penetration , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Jerry R. Green,et al.  Characterization of Satisfactory Mechanisms for the Revelation of Preferences for Public Goods , 1977 .

[12]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Hidden power system inflexibilities imposed by traditional unit commitment formulations , 2017 .

[13]  Rodrigo Moreno,et al.  Chebyshev based continuous time power system operation approach , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[14]  Albert Moser,et al.  Development of adaptive time patterns for multi-dimensional power system simulations , 2017, 2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[15]  Brian Ó Gallachóir,et al.  The impact of sub-hourly modelling in power systems with significant levels of renewable generation , 2014 .

[16]  Qiaozhu Zhai,et al.  Subhourly unit commitment with feasible energy delivery constraints , 2012 .

[17]  Javier García-González,et al.  An MIP Formulation for Joint Market-Clearing of Energy and Reserves Based on Ramp Scheduling , 2014 .

[18]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Effect of time resolution on unit commitment decisions in systems with high wind penetration , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[19]  Nivad Navid,et al.  Market Solutions for Managing Ramp Flexibility With High Penetration of Renewable Resource , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[20]  Claudio Gentile,et al.  Tight MIP formulations of the power-based unit commitment problem , 2015, OR Spectr..

[21]  Andres Ramos,et al.  An MIP Formulation for Joint Market-Clearing of Energy and Reserves Based on Ramp Scheduling , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Deterministic frequency deviations – root causes and proposals for potential solutions , 2012 .

[23]  M. Rothleder,et al.  Enhanced system reliability using flexible ramp constraint in CAISO market , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.