Comparative evaluation of the Rose Bengal plate test, standard tube agglutination test and complement fixation test for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.

In this study, 241 serum samples from individuals exposed to brucellosis were subjected to the Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT); the titre was estimated by standard tube agglutination test (STAT), with positive > or = 80 IU/ml. Randomly selected sera (n = 81) were analysed by complement fixation test (CFT): titre > or = 1:4 was considered positive. Of 241 sera subjected to RBPT and STAT, 177 were negative in both tests; 5 samples tested negative by RBPT but positive by STAT. None was positive by RBPT and negative by STAT. Of 81 sera subjected to CFT, 23 (28.4%) were positive. Both RBPT and CFT found 18 samples positive; 5 samples were positive by CFT and negative by RBPT. Comparison of STAT with CFT showed 13 samples positive by STAT but negative by CFT, and 4 positive by CFT but negative by STAT. The sensitivity and specificity of STAT were 82.6% and 77.6%, respectively, with CFT as gold standard. No test is perfect, and the clinical history coupled with a combination of two or more tests will reduce diagnostic errors.

[1]  H. Saxena,et al.  Comparative efficacy of Rose Bengal plate test, standard tube agglutination test and Dot ELISA in immunological detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in sera , 2009 .

[2]  G. Escobar,et al.  The Value of Serologic Tests for Diagnosis and Follow up of Patients having Brucellosis , 2007 .

[3]  David L. Pearl,et al.  Veterinary Epidemiology, 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[4]  M. Corbel,et al.  Brucellosis in humans and animals. , 2006 .

[5]  N. Commander,et al.  Brucellosis – new aspects of an old disease , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[6]  C. Saegerman,et al.  Evaluation of three serum i-ELISAs using monoclonal antibodies and protein G as peroxidase conjugate for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. , 2004, Veterinary microbiology.

[7]  J. Serra,et al.  Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis in a rural endemic area in northeastern Spain. , 2004, International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology.

[8]  A. Robinson.  Guidelines for coordinated human and animal brucellosis surveillance. , 2003 .

[9]  G. Renukaradhya,et al.  Epidemiology, zoonotic aspects, vaccination and control/eradication of brucellosis in India. , 2002, Veterinary microbiology.

[10]  K. Nielsen.  Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology. , 2002, Veterinary microbiology.

[11]  C. M. Hendrix.  Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines , 1997 .

[12]  H. Lewerenz.  Evaluation of Certain Food Additives. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, 18. Report. 37 Seiten Rom, 4. bis 13. Juni 1974. World Health Organization, techn. Rep. Ser. No. 557, Geneva 1974. Preis: 5,—SFr. , 1976 .

[13]  G. G. Alton,et al.  Laboratory Techniques in Brucellosis, 2nd Edition , 1975 .

[14]  G. G. Alton,et al.  Laboratory techniques in brucellosis. , 1975, Monograph series. World Health Organization.

[15]  G. G. Alton,et al.  Laboratory techniques in brucellosis. , 1967, Monograph series. World Health Organization.