Improving Glaucoma Diagnosis by the Combination of Perimetry and HRT Measurements

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine, whether the combination of morphologic data of the optic nerve head and visual field (VF) data would improve diagnosis of glaucoma, on the basis of the measurements alone. Patients and MethodsEighty-eight perimetric glaucomatous and 88 normal optic discs from the Erlangen Glaucoma Registry were matched for age. All normals and patients were examined in a standardized manner (Slitlamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, 24 h-applanation tonometry, automated VF testing, 15-degree optic disc stereographs, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT)-scanning of the optic disc). The HRT variables were calculated in 4 optic disc sectors. All variables were calculated with the software's standard reference plane. To gain the same allocation of sectors as provided by the HRT software, the VF responses were averaged within 4 sectors. Classification results of these VF responses were compared with the summarized results within 4 sectors. Six different combinations of morphologic and VF data were used to assess their suitability to diagnose the disease. HRT measurements, and the standard output of the Octopus (HRT/PERI1), HRT measurements and the summarized sectors and their standard deviations (HRT/PERI2), HRT measurements, standard output of the octopus and the summarized sectors and their standard deviations (HRT/PERI1/PERI2), standard output of the Octopus (PERI1), summarized sectors of the Octopus and their standard deviations (PERI2) and HRT measurements. To assess the diagnostic value of the different data sets machine learning classifiers, stabilized linear discriminant analysis, classification trees, bagging, and double-bagging were applied. ResultsCombination of morphologic and VF data improved the automated classification rules. The accuracy to diagnose glaucoma just by VF and HRT indices was maximized for double-bagging using both diagnostic tools. An estimated misclassification probability of less than 0.07 could be achieved for the primary open angle glaucoma patients combining HRT and VF sectors by double bagging. So highest sensitivity was 95% and specificity 91%, achieved by double-bagging and combination of HRT, PERI1, and PERI2. ConclusionsThe combination of optic disc measurements and VF data could not only improve glaucoma diagnosis in future, but could also help to find an objective way to diagnose glaucomatous optic atrophy. The limitation of the topographic relationship between structure and function is the individual variability of the optic disc morphology and the subjective variability of VF testing.

[1]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Using Iterated Bagging to Debias Regressions , 2001, Machine Learning.

[2]  J. Jonas,et al.  Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  F. Horn,et al.  Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph , 1998, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  L. Breiman.  OUT-OF-BAG ESTIMATION , 1996 .

[5]  H. Taylor,et al.  Association of demographic, familial, medical, and ocular factors with intraocular pressure. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[7]  S. Kropf,et al.  Multivariate tests based on left-spherically distributed linear scores , 1998 .

[8]  J. Jonas,et al.  Correlation between mean visual field loss and morphometric optic disk variables in the open-angle glaucomas. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Torsten Hothorn,et al.  Double-Bagging: Combining Classifiers by Bootstrap Aggregation , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  R. Weinreb,et al.  The structure-function relationship in eyes with glaucomatous visual field loss that crosses the horizontal meridian. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Jürgen Läuter.  Stabile multivariate Verfahren : Diskriminanzanalyse - Regressionsanalyse - Faktoranalyse , 1992 .

[12]  Torsten Hothorn,et al.  New glaucoma classification method based on standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters by bagging classification trees. , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.

[13]  J M Sparrow,et al.  Optic disc cup slope and visual field indices in normal, ocular hypertensive and early glaucomatous eyes , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Mapping structural damage of the optic disk to visual field defect in glaucoma. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  J. Jonas,et al.  Histomorphometry of the human optic nerve. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  P A Sample,et al.  Mapping structural to functional damage in glaucoma with standard automated perimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[18]  Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Zum Einflu der Konturlinie auf die Exkavationsflche beim Heidelberg Retina Tomograph , 1996 .

[19]  G K Krieglstein,et al.  [Effect of the contour line on cup surface using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph]. , 1996, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[20]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  P A Sample,et al.  Spatial relationship of motion automated perimetry and optic disc topography in patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy. , 1999, Journal of glaucoma.