Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: The Future of Frontline CML Therapy

All available data from ongoing studies of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) were reviewed. In two nilotinib phase 2 trials, the speed and depth of molecular and cytogenetic responses were greater than responses to imatinib. Furthermore, only one patient in each study progressed to accelerated or blastic phase. In the phase 3 ENESTnd study, molecular and cytogenetic responses to nilotinib were superior to imatinib, and more patients achieved undetectable levels of disease with nilotinib. Nilotinib also demonstrated significantly lower progression than did imatinib. In the ongoing phase 2 study of dasatinib, the speed and depth of molecular and cytogenetic responses were higher compared with expected responses to imatinib; no patient to date has progressed. In the phase 3 DASISION study, molecular and cytogenetic responses to dasatinib were superior to those of imatinib and fewer patients progressed. The results suggest that second-generation TKIs have the potential to replace imatinib as the standard of care for patients with early CML-CP. Future CML therapy might include earlier use of these agents to help more patients achieve complete molecular response and may be a path to a CML cure. Clin Cancer Res; 17(7); 1674–83. ©2011 AACR.

[1]  Haixia Gong,et al.  Ga13 and Talin Coordinate integrin Inside-out and Outside-In Signaling by “time-sharing” of b3 cytoplasmic Domain , 2010 .

[2]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) Versus Imatinib In Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2010 .

[3]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Dasatinib Versus Imatinib In Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) In the DASISION Trial: 18-Month Follow-up , 2010 .

[4]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Excellent Outcomes at 3 Years with Nilotinib 800 Mg Daily In Early Chronic Phase, Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Results of a Phase 2 GIMEMA CML WP Clinical Trial , 2010 .

[5]  R. Larson,et al.  ENESTnd Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib In Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) , 2010 .

[6]  Ricardo Pasquini,et al.  Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  I. Hozo,et al.  Decitabine versus 5-azacitidine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome: adjusted indirect meta-analysis , 2010, Haematologica.

[8]  Susan O'Brien,et al.  Results of dasatinib therapy in patients with early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Susan Branford,et al.  Phase III, randomized, open-label study of daily imatinib mesylate 400 mg versus 800 mg in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase using molecular end points: tyrosine kinase inhibitor optimization and selectivity study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Susan O'Brien,et al.  Nilotinib as front-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. Gordon Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2010 .

[12]  M. Gordon Nilotinib versus Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2010 .

[13]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph(+) chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2009, Blood.

[14]  G. D. Gatta,et al.  The HOX11/TLX1 Transcription Factor Oncogene Induces Chromosomal Aneuploidy in T-ALL. , 2009 .

[15]  M. Marden,et al.  Unstable Alpha Hemoglobin Stabilizing Protein as a Cause of Thalassemia: Proof of Concept. , 2009 .

[16]  C. Sherr,et al.  Developmentally Restricted Protection From Notch1-Induced T Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by the Arf Tumor Suppressor. , 2009 .

[17]  J. Radich,et al.  24 Months Update of the TOPS Study: a Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study of 400mg/d (SD-IM) Versus 800mg/d (HD-IM) of Imatinib Mesylate (IM) in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP). , 2009 .

[18]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Imatinib 800 Mg Vs. Imatinib 400 Mg +/- IFN in Newly Diagnosed BCR/ABL Positive Chronic Phase CML: Analysis of Molecular Remission at 12 Months; The German CML-Study IV. , 2009 .

[19]  J. Radich,et al.  International randomized study of interferon Vs STI571 (IRIS) 8-year follow up: Sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib , 2009 .

[20]  F. Giles,et al.  Nilotinib 300 Mg Twice Daily Is Effective and Well Tolerated as First Line Treatment of Ph-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: Preliminary Results of the ICORG 0802 Phase 2 Study. , 2009 .

[21]  D. Gilliland,et al.  Genetic characterization of TET1, TET2, and TET3 alterations in myeloid malignancies. , 2009, Blood.

[22]  M. Goodell,et al.  CD81 Is Essential for HSC Self-Renewal through Suppressing Proliferation , 2008 .

[23]  Andreas Hochhaus,et al.  Intermittent target inhibition with dasatinib 100 mg once daily preserves efficacy and improves tolerability in imatinib-resistant and -intolerant chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Efficacy of dasatinib in patients (pts) with previously untreated chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in early chronic phase (CML-CP) , 2008 .

[25]  J. Cortes,et al.  Bosutinib is safe and active in patients (pts) with chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with resistance or intolerance to imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2008 .

[26]  R M Stone,et al.  Dasatinib induces durable cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase with resistance or intolerance to imatinib , 2008, Leukemia.

[27]  R. Larson,et al.  Time to Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Does Not Affect Long-Term Outcomes for Patients on Imatinib Therapy. , 2007 .

[28]  M. Konopleva,et al.  Efficacy of Nilotinib in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Early Chronic Phase (CML-CP). , 2007 .

[29]  K. Bhalla,et al.  Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance. , 2007, Blood.

[30]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Dasatinib induces notable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib therapy. , 2007, Blood.

[31]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. , 2006, Blood.

[33]  Simona Soverini,et al.  Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. , 2006, Blood.