Highly accelerated contrast‐enhanced MR angiography: Improved reconstruction accuracy and reduced noise amplification with complex subtraction

Contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is routinely performed using parallel imaging to best capture the first pass of contrast material through the target vasculature, followed by digital subtraction to suppress the appearance of unwanted signal from background tissue. Both processes, however, amplify noise and can produce uninterpretable images when large acceleration factors are used. Using a phantom study of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, we show that complex subtraction processing prior to partially parallel reconstruction improves reconstruction accuracy relative to magnitude subtraction processing for reduction factors as large as 12. Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiographic data obtainedwith complex subtraction in volunteers supported the results of the phantom study and when compared with magnitude subtraction processing demonstrated reduced geometry factors as well as improved image quality at large reduction factors. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Edelman,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional time-of-flight sequence. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  D. L. Johnston,et al.  Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Martin Blaimer,et al.  General formulation for quantitative G‐factor calculation in GRAPPA reconstructions , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Yuexi Huang,et al.  Analysis of subtraction methods in three‐dimensional contrast‐enhanced peripheral MR angiography , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  S J Riederer,et al.  High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study , 2002, The Lancet.

[8]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  V B Ho,et al.  Gadolinium‐enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic vessels , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Z. Cho,et al.  Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance tomographic imaging , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. , 1995, Radiology.

[12]  María A Fernández-Seara,et al.  2D partially parallel imaging with k‐space surrounding neighbors‐based data reconstruction , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Stephen J Riederer,et al.  Intrinsic signal amplification in the application of 2D SENSE parallel imaging to 3D contrast‐enhanced elliptical centric MRA and MRV , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Debatin,et al.  Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[15]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Peripheral MR angiography: separation of arteries from veins with flow-spoiled gradient pulses in electrocardiography-triggered three-dimensional half-Fourier fast spin-echo imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[16]  G. Laub,et al.  3D Time-Resolved MR Angiography (MRA) of the Carotid Arteries with Time-Resolved Imaging with Stochastic Trajectories: Comparison with 3D Contrast-Enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D Time-Of-Flight MRA , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  R R Edelman,et al.  Signal targeting with alternating radiofrequency (STAR) sequences: Application to MR angiography , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: detection with subtracted and nonsubtracted MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[19]  M Takahashi,et al.  Three‐dimensional high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: Diagnostic accuracy , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  F. Huang,et al.  High‐pass GRAPPA: An image support reduction technique for improved partially parallel imaging , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  James F Glockner,et al.  Peripheral vasculature: high-temporal- and high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. , 2009, Radiology.

[23]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study☆ , 2002 .

[24]  Eri Shibata,et al.  Enhancement effects and relaxivities of gadolinium-DTPA at 1.5 versus 3 Tesla: a phantom study. , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.