Mega-Analysis of Meta-Analyses

Conflicting reports on the effectiveness of these approaches abound-but meta-analysis can help sort out overall benefits and weaknesses of these and other educational practices . This article reports on some of these broad studies of research that seem to indicate effectiveand noneffective-teaching strategies. But as special educators all know, the most important consideration is a knowledge of what works with your individual student, as well as a compelling curiosity that leads you to read the meta-analyses for yourself. In meta-analysis, a researcher examines many studies on a particular strategy and derives a numerical indicator of the relative effectiveness of the strategy , averaged across all studies. This indicator is called an effect size (ES) (see box, "How Meta-analysis Works"). Such an analysis of research not only provides a numerical indicator of the relative effect of a particular intervention, but the effect size also allows comparison with other approaches used in special education or related services.

[1]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Research on Class Size and Achievement , 1979 .

[2]  K. Kavale,et al.  Hyperactivity and Diet Treatment , 1983, Journal of learning disabilities.

[3]  W. A. T. White,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Direct Instruction in Special Education. , 1988 .

[4]  K. Kavale,et al.  “One Jumped Off the Balance Beam” , 1983, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction With Exceptional Children , 1985 .

[6]  J. Lloyd,et al.  Effects of Reading Comprehension Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1994 .

[7]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Systematic Formative Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis , 1986, Exceptional children.

[8]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Constructing more meaningful relationships: Mnemonic instruction for special populations , 1989 .

[9]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  Substance over Style: Assessing the Efficacy of Modality Testing and Teaching , 1987 .

[10]  M. Mastropieri,et al.  The Efficacy of Early Intervention Programs: A Meta-Analysis , 1986, Exceptional children.

[11]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Handicapped Students as Tutors , 1985 .

[12]  K. Kavale,et al.  The Efficacy of Stimulant Drug Treatment for Hyperactivity , 1982, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  Treating Social Skill Deficits in Children with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of the Research , 1996 .

[14]  R. Hanka The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1994 .

[15]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  The Effectiveness of Drug Treatment for Severe Behavior Disorders: A Meta-Analysis , 1984 .

[16]  Ann Casey,et al.  Interventions for Behaviorally Disordered Students: A Quantitative Review and Methodological Critique , 1985 .

[17]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  The Efficacy of Special Versus Regular Class Placement for Exceptional Children: a Meta-Analysis , 1980 .

[18]  K. Kavale Functions of the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA): Are They Trainable? , 1981, Exceptional children.