In industrial environments, the heat exchanger is a necessary component to any strategy of energy conversion. Much of thermal energy used in industrial processes passes at least one times by a heat exchanger, and methods systems recovering thermal energy. This survey paper tries to presents in a systemic way an sample control of a heat exchanger by comparison between three controllers LQR (linear quadratic regulator), PID (proportional, integrator and derivate) and Pole Placement. All of these controllers are used mainly in industrial sectors (chemicals, petrochemicals, steel, food processing, energy production, etc...) of transportation (automotive, aeronautics), but also in the residential sector and tertiary (heating, air conditioning, etc...) The choice of a heat exchanger, for a given application depends on many parameters: field temperature and pressure of fluids, and physical properties of aggressive fluids, maintenance and space. It is clear that the fact of having an exchanger appropriate, well-sized, well made and well used allows gain efficiency and energy processes. Keywords—LQR linear-quadratic regulator, PID control, Pole Placement, Heat exchanger.
[1]
Zdzislaw Bubnicki,et al.
Modern Control Theory
,
2005
.
[2]
S. Kahne,et al.
Optimal control: An introduction to the theory and ITs applications
,
1967,
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.
[3]
K. Hunt.
APPLIED OPTIMAL CONTROL AND ESTIMATION : DIGITAL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
,
1993
.
[4]
Mustapha Ait Lafkih,et al.
Design of Linear Quadratic Gaussian Controller for Sample Power System
,
2013
.
[5]
B. Anderson,et al.
Linear Optimal Control
,
1971
.
[6]
Aytekin Bagis,et al.
Determination of the PID Controller Parameters by Modified Genetic Algorithm for Improved Performance
,
2007,
J. Inf. Sci. Eng..