Outcomes of telephone medical care

AbstractOBJECTIVES: To document the outcomes of a telephone coverage system and identify patient characteristics that may predict these outcomes. DESIGN: Telephone survey. SETTING: An academic outpatient medical practice that has a physician telephone coverage service. PATIENTS: All patients (483) who called during the 3-week study period to speak to a physician were evaluated, and for the 180 patients with symptoms, attempts were made to survey them by telephone 1 week after their initial telephone call. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean age of the 180 patients was 41 years, 71% were female, and 56% belonged to commercial managed care plans. In the week after the initial telephone call, the following outcomes were reported: 27% of the patients had no further contact with the practice; 9% filled a prescription medication; 19% called the practice again; 48% kept an earlier appointment in the practice; 3% saw an internist elsewhere; 8% saw a specialist; 8% went to an emergency department; 4% were admitted to a hospital. Of the 180 patients who called with symptoms, 160 (89%) were successfully contacted for survey. Eighty-seven percent of these 160 patients rated their satisfaction with the care they received over the telephone as excellent, very good, or good. In multivariate analysis, patients’ own health perception identified those most likely to have symptom relief (p=.002), and symptom relief, in turn, was a strong predictor of high patient satisfaction (p=.006). Thirty-three percent of the 160 patients reported that they would have gone to an emergency department if a physician were not available by telephone. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, younger patients, female patients, and patients in commercial managed care plans used the telephone most frequently. Also, the telephone provided a viable alternative to emergency department and walk-in visits. Overall satisfaction with telephone medicine was high, and the strongest predictors of high patient satisfaction were symptom relief and patients’ own health perception.

[1]  J. Dale,et al.  Patients telephoning A&E for advice: a comparison of expectations and outcomes. , 1997, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[2]  D. M. Elnicki,et al.  Physician attitudes regarding telephone medicine , 1996, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  James S. Studdiford,et al.  The telephone in primary care. , 1996, Primary care.

[4]  D. M. Elnicki,et al.  Telephone Management Training in Internal Medicine Residencies: A National Survey of Program Directors , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  J. B. Erdmann,et al.  A Model for Predicting HEAL Repayment Patterns and Its Implications for Medical Student Financing , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  Green Dl,et al.  After-hours telephone calls in a family practice residency: volume, seriousness, and patient satisfaction. , 1995 .

[7]  A. Nelson Compensating physicians for telephone calls. , 1995, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[8]  P. Sorum Compensating physicians for telephone calls. , 1994, JAMA.

[9]  D. M. Elnicki,et al.  Can You Hold Please? How Internal Medicine Residents Deal With Patient Telephone Calls , 1994 .

[10]  R. M. Peters After-hours telephone calls to general and subspecialty internists , 1994, Journal of general internal medicine.

[11]  D. Isaacman Telephone Fees: Are They Worth It? , 1993, Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[12]  S. Braithwaite,et al.  Phone Fees: A Justification of Physician Charges , 1993, Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[13]  K. Arheart,et al.  Telephone medicine in a southern university private practice. , 1993, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[14]  D Allen,et al.  Evaluation of the use and usefulness of telephone consultations in one general practice. , 1992, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[15]  J. Wasson,et al.  Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. , 1992, JAMA.

[16]  J. Zylke Physicians need better line on how, when to respond to patients via telephone. , 1990, JAMA.

[17]  C. Johnson,et al.  Telephone medicine , 1990, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[18]  R. Girard,et al.  Telephone Patient Management by Primary Care Physicians , 1989, Medical care.

[19]  Spencer Dc,et al.  Characteristics of patients who highly utilize telephone medical care in a private practice. , 1989 .

[20]  M. Fleming,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a telephone medicine curriculum. , 1988, Medical care.

[21]  E. M. Bertera,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of telephone vs clinic counseling for hypertensive patients: a pilot study. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[22]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[23]  M. Flannery,et al.  Telephone medical care administered by internal medicine residents: concerns of program directors and implications for residency training. , 1997, American Journal of the Medical Sciences.

[24]  D. M. Elnicki,et al.  Issues affecting residents’ attitudes about telephone medicine for ambulatory patients , 1996 .

[25]  J. Probst,et al.  After-hours telephone calls in a family practice residency: volume, seriousness, and patient satisfaction. , 1995, Family Medicine.

[26]  Isaacman Dj Telephone fees: are they worth it? , 1993 .

[27]  D. Spencer,et al.  Characteristics of patients who highly utilize telephone medical care in a private practice. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.