Electrophysiological markers of covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.

To study the existence and neural basis of covert face recognition in individuals with developmental prosopagnosia, we tested a group of 12 participants with developmental prosopagnosia in a task that required them to judge the familiarity of successively presented famous or non-famous faces. Electroencephalography was recorded during task performance, and event-related brain potentials were computed for recognized famous faces, non-recognized famous faces and non-famous faces. In six individuals with developmental prosopagnosia, non-recognized famous faces triggered an occipito-temporal N250 component, which is thought to reflect the activation of stored visual memory traces of known individual faces. In contrast to the N250, the P600f component, which is linked to late semantic stages of face identity processing, was not triggered by non-recognized famous faces. Event-related potential correlates of explicit face recognition obtained on those few trials where participants with developmental prosopagnosia classified famous faces as known or familiar, were similar to the effects previously found in participants with intact face recognition abilities, suggesting that face recognition mechanisms in individuals with developmental prosopagnosia are not qualitatively different from that of unimpaired individuals. Overall, these event-related potential results provide the first neurophysiological evidence for covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia, and suggest this phenomenon results from disconnected links between intact identity-specific visual memory traces and later semantic face processing stages. They also imply that the activation of stored visual representations of familiar faces is not sufficient for conscious explicit face recognition.

[1]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Covert face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia: A group study , 2012, Cortex.

[2]  R A McCarthy,et al.  Prosopagnosia and structural encoding of faces: evidence from event-related potentials. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[3]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  The covert priming effect of faces in prosopagnosia , 2004, Neurology.

[6]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[7]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Joachim Bodamer,et al.  Die Prosop-Agnosie , 2004, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[9]  Brad Duchaine,et al.  Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Martin Eimer,et al.  An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  L. Deouell,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia , 1999 .

[13]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[14]  E. Renzi,et al.  Apperceptive and Associative Forms of Prosopagnosia , 1991, Cortex.

[15]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[16]  M. Eimer,et al.  Response profile of the face-sensitive N170 component: a rapid adaptation study. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: a Window to Content-specific Face Processing This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited Developmental Prosopagnosia and Inferences to Functional Organization Investigating the Architecture of Face Processing through Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2022 .

[18]  F. Lopera,et al.  Brain potentials reflect residual face processing in a case of prosopagnosia , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  A Fifteen Year Follow-Up of a Case of Developmental Prosopagnosia , 1991, Cortex.

[20]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[21]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. , 1995 .

[22]  C. Jacques,et al.  The Speed of Individual Face Categorization , 2006, Psychological science.

[23]  Robert D. Jones,et al.  Severe Developmental Prosopagnosia in a Child With Superior Intellect , 2001, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[24]  Francesco Nocera,et al.  Resampling approach to statistical inference: Bootstrapping from event-related potentials data , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[25]  J. Barton.  Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[26]  A. Young,et al.  Cross-Domain Semantic Priming in Normal Subjects and a Prosopagnosic Patient , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  H Begleiter,et al.  Event-related brain potentials differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  Tim Valentine,et al.  Evidence of Covert Recognition in a Prosopagnosic Patient , 1994, Cortex.

[29]  Mariya V. Cherkasova,et al.  Covert recognition in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia , 2001, Neurology.

[30]  M Coltheart,et al.  MODELS OF FACE RECOGNITION AND DELUSIONAL MISIDENTIFICATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[31]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding covert recognition , 1991, Cognition.

[32]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Implicit familiarity processing in congenital prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[33]  Stefan R. Schweinberger,et al.  Covert Recognition and the Neural System for Face Processing , 2003, Cortex.

[34]  A. Karmiloff-Smith.  Crucial differences between developmental cognitive neuroscience and adult neuropsychology , 1997 .

[35]  R. Bauer,et al.  Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A neuropsychological application of the guilty knowledge test , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  A. Burton,et al.  N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions , 2004, Neuroreport.

[37]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[38]  M. Eimer.  Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  M J Farah,et al.  Dissociated overt and covert recognition as an emergent property of a lesioned neural network. , 1993, Psychological review.