Break-up, coalescence and catastrophic phase inversion in turbulent contactors.

When a low concentration of immiscible phase is dispersed, break-up in the impeller region controls the drop size. The traditional application of Kolmogoroff's theory of local isotropic turbulence has been moderately successful in relating equilibrium drop sizes to the physical properties and the turbulent flow, with low power number impellers giving smaller drops at equal mean specific energy dissipation rates, [Formula: see text] However, to explain the reduction in drop size at equal [Formula: see text] on scale-up, the concept of intermittency must be introduced leading to a scale-up rule close to constant tip speed. With increasing concentration, coalescence generally becomes important and drop sizes increase. Modelling of coalescence involves collision frequency and coalescence efficiency. The latter is dependent on the type of drop interface, the establishment of which type for a particular system being difficult. The difficulty is compounded since in clean systems, at concentrations of the aqueous phase > approximately 20% by volume, droplets of oil appear in the aqueous drops whilst the converse is not found. At sufficiently high concentrations, where the concept of collision frequency is questionable, catastrophic phase inversion (CPI) occurs because coalescence becomes so high. Anything that enhances coalescence, e.g. surfactants, particles that bridge interfaces, wettable surfaces, bulk flow patterns, encourages CPI to occur at lower concentrations of dispersed phase. Satisfactory models for CPI are not available.

[1]  Suzanne M. Kresta,et al.  Evolution of drop size distribution in liquid–liquid dispersions for various impellers* , 1998 .

[2]  Satoru Kato,et al.  Types of dispersion in agitated liquid-liquid systems , 1991 .

[3]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  On the structure of turbulent liquid—liquid dispersed flows in an agitated vessel , 1994 .

[4]  J. Hinze Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes , 1955 .

[5]  W. J. McManamey Sauter mean and maximum drop diameters of liquid-liquid dispersions in turbulent agitated vessels at low dispersed phase hold-up , 1979 .

[6]  A. Pacek,et al.  Video technique for measuring dynamics of liquid‐liquid dispersion during phase inversion , 1994 .

[7]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  On the Sauter mean diameter and size distributions in turbulent liquid/liquid dispersions in a stirred vessel , 1998 .

[8]  S. Kresta,et al.  Impact of tank geometry on the maximum turbulence energy dissipation rate for impellers , 1996 .

[9]  A. Nienow,et al.  Delayed phase inversion in stirred liquid—liquid dispersions , 1989 .

[10]  S. Saito,et al.  EFFECT OF DISPERSED-PHASE VISCOSITY ON THE MAXIMUM STABLE DROP SIZE FOR BREAKUP IN TURBULENT FLOW , 1977 .

[11]  E. S. Ortiz,et al.  Scale-up of liquid-liquid dispersions in stirred tanks , 1990 .

[12]  Sanjeev Kumar,et al.  Influence of the wetting characteristics of the impeller on phase inversion , 1991 .

[13]  D. Ramkrishna,et al.  Coalescence of charged droplets in agitated liquid‐liquid dispersions , 1992 .

[14]  Suzanne M. Kresta,et al.  Correlation of mean drop size and minimum drop size with the turbulence energy dissipation and the flow in an agitated tank , 1998 .

[15]  Richard V. Calabrese,et al.  Drop breakup in turbulent stirred‐tank contactors. Part I: Effect of dispersed‐phase viscosity , 1986 .

[16]  A. Pacek,et al.  The influence of impeller type on mean drop size and drop size distribution in an agitated vessel , 1999 .

[17]  C. Sleicher,et al.  Factors affecting which phase will disperse when immiscible liquids are stirred together , 1965 .

[18]  J. Bourne,et al.  Effects of agitation and scale-up on drop size in turbulent dispersions: allowance for intermittency , 2001 .

[19]  W. Agterof,et al.  On the Mechanism of the Inversion of Emulsions , 1998 .

[20]  Hsiao Tsung Chen,et al.  Drop size distribution in agitated liquid‐liquid systems , 1967 .

[21]  S. Saito,et al.  Scale effect on breakup process in liquid-liquid agitated tanks. , 1983 .

[22]  Lawrence L. Tavlarides,et al.  Description of interaction processes in agitated liquid-liquid dispersions , 1977 .

[23]  O. Erga,et al.  Phase inversion behavior of water-kerosene dispersions , 1988 .

[24]  J. T. Davies,et al.  Drop sizes of emulsions related to turbulent energy dissipation rates , 1985 .