Lagrangian Relaxation With Incremental Proximal Method for Economic Dispatch With Large Numbers of Wind Power Scenarios

Scenario-based approaches have been widely employed in stochastic economic dispatch with wind power integration. However, due to computational limitations, the number of wind power scenarios usually need to be reduced to a small subset of all available scenarios. The limited number of scenarios could affect the objective performance related to the correlations and uncertainties of wind power, especially when the influence of extreme scenarios needs to be accounted for. To increase the computational efficiency of economic dispatch problem with a large number of scenarios, we propose a Lagrangian relaxation with incremental proximal method to solve the dispatch problem. This approach combines the benefit of Lagrangian relaxation, which allows the problem to be decomposed into a large number of smaller problems and the proximal method, which lead to much faster convergence. In addition, we also propose a multipliers and primal variables initialization method to further reduce the convergence time. Results of case studies show that this framework greatly reduces the computation time and the system cost of economic dispatch compared with the traditional approaches.

[1]  Jian Xu,et al.  Efficient scenario generation of multiple renewable power plants considering spatial and temporal correlations , 2018, Applied Energy.

[2]  S. SHORT-TERM GENERATION SCHEDULING WITH TRANSMISSION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS USING AN AUGMENTED LAGRANGIAN RELAXATION , 2009 .

[3]  Rui Shi,et al.  An Efficient Approach to Power System Uncertainty Analysis With High-Dimensional Dependencies , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Sarah M. Ryan,et al.  Solution sensitivity-based scenario reduction for stochastic unit commitment , 2014, Computational Management Science.

[5]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Data-Driven Probabilistic Net Load Forecasting With High Penetration of Behind-the-Meter PV , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Volatile Wind Power Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Yuzong Liu,et al.  Scenario Reduction With Submodular Optimization , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Incremental proximal methods for large scale convex optimization , 2011, Math. Program..

[9]  Jian Xu,et al.  Look-Ahead Economic Dispatch With Adjustable Confidence Interval Based on a Truncated Versatile Distribution Model for Wind Power , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  K. Bruninx,et al.  Scenario reduction techniques and solution stability for stochastic unit commitment problems , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON).

[11]  Sarah M. Ryan,et al.  Scenario reduction for stochastic unit commitment with wind penetration , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[12]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Incremental Gradient, Subgradient, and Proximal Methods for Convex Optimization: A Survey , 2015, ArXiv.

[13]  A. Conejo,et al.  Scenario Reduction for Futures Market Trading in Electricity Markets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  N. Growe-Kuska,et al.  Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[15]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Modeling Conditional Forecast Error for Wind Power in Generation Scheduling , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Werner Römisch,et al.  Scenario Reduction Algorithms in Stochastic Programming , 2003, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[17]  Peter Richtárik,et al.  Separable approximations and decomposition methods for the augmented Lagrangian , 2013, Optim. Methods Softw..

[18]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[19]  Meysam Doostizadeh,et al.  Energy and Reserve Scheduling Under Wind Power Uncertainty: An Adjustable Interval Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[20]  Rüdiger,et al.  WILMAR Deliverable 6 . 2 ( d ) Documentation Methodology of the Scenario Tree Tool , 2006 .

[21]  Jitka Dupacová,et al.  Scenario reduction in stochastic programming , 2003, Math. Program..

[22]  Wei Tian,et al.  Chance-Constrained Day-Ahead Scheduling in Stochastic Power System Operation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  Peter B. Luh,et al.  A decomposition and coordination approach for large-scale security constrained unit commitment problems with combined cycle units , 2017, 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[24]  Tao Ding,et al.  Parallel Augmented Lagrangian Relaxation for Dynamic Economic Dispatch Using Diagonal Quadratic Approximation Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[25]  Wenchuan Wu,et al.  Dynamic Economic Dispatch Using Lagrangian Relaxation With Multiplier Updates Based on a Quasi-Newton Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  Nirmal-Kumar C. Nair,et al.  A Two-Stage Stochastic Dynamic Economic Dispatch Model Considering Wind Uncertainty , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[27]  Nikolaos Gatsis,et al.  Decentralized Stochastic Optimal Power Flow in Radial Networks With Distributed Generation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[28]  Bri-Mathias Hodge,et al.  The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit , 2015 .