The impact of clinical leadership on health information technology adoption: Systematic review

PURPOSE To conduct a systematic review to examine evidence of associations between clinical leadership and successful information technology (IT) adoption in healthcare organisations. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Business Source Premier for articles published between January 2000 to May 2013 with keywords and subject terms related to: (1) the setting--healthcare provider organisations; (2) the technology--health information technology; (3) the process--adoption; and (4) the intervention--leadership. We identified 3121 unique citations, of which 32 met our criteria and were included in the review. Data extracted from the included studies were assessed in light of two frameworks: Bassellier et al.'s IT competence framework; and Avgar et al.'s health IT adoption framework. RESULTS The results demonstrate important associations between the attributes of clinical leaders and IT adoption. Clinical leaders who have technical informatics skills and prior experience with IT project management are likely to develop a vision that comprises a long-term commitment to the use of IT. Leaders who possess such a vision believe in the value of IT, are motivated to adopt it, and can maintain confidence and stability through the adversities that IT adoptions often entail. This leads to proactive leadership behaviours and partnerships with IT professionals that are associated with successful organisational and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This review provides evidence that clinical leaders can positively contribute to successful IT adoption in healthcare organisations. Clinical leaders who aim for improvements in the processes and quality of care should cultivate the necessary IT competencies, establish mutual partnerships with IT professionals, and execute proactive IT behaviours to achieve successful IT adoption.

[1]  Adam Wright,et al.  Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[2]  James Thomas,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: a Critical Review , 2022 .

[3]  Andrea M. Wessell,et al.  Implementing and Evaluating Electronic Standing Orders in Primary Care Practice: A PPRNet Study , 2012, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[4]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions , 2010, BMC health services research.

[5]  John Walker.  Implementation , 2001 .

[6]  David C. Yen,et al.  Critical factors for adopting PACS in Taiwan: Views of radiology department directors , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Guy Paré,et al.  Implementing clinical information systems: a multiple-case study within a US hospital , 2002, Health services management research.

[8]  Paul G Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Secure Messaging Between Providers and Patients, and Patients’ Access to Their Own Medical Record , 2012 .

[9]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Decoupling, re‐engaging: managing trust relationships in implementation projects , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Model Formulation: Multimethod Evaluation of Information and Communication Technologies in Health in the Context of Wicked Problems and Sociotechnical Theory , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Arie Hasman,et al.  Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[12]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: An interpretative review , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  Neset Hikmet,et al.  State of Content: Healthcare Executive’s Role in Information Technology Adoption , 2012 .

[14]  Evelyn H. Thrasher,et al.  An empirical examination of antecedents and consequences of IT governance in US hospitals , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Enrico Coiera.  Why e‐health is so hard , 2013, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  B. James,et al.  Ten strategies to lower costs, improve quality, and engage patients: the view from leading health system CEOs. , 2013, Health affairs.

[17]  F. Mair,et al.  Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[18]  Christian Nøhr,et al.  Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics , 2007 .

[19]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Maturity: the Story of the Veterans Health Administration Enterprise Architecture: a Strategic Weapon , 2022 .

[21]  John Doucette,et al.  Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  Dimitra I. Petrakaki,et al.  Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from a prospective national evaluation in 'early adopter' hospitals , 2011 .

[23]  Constance M. Johnson,et al.  Safety Issues Related to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR): Synthesis of the Literature from the Last Decade, 2000‐2009 , 2011, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[24]  Keri E. Pearlson,et al.  Managing and Using Information Systems , 2001 .

[25]  Rai-Fu Chen,et al.  A Study of Factors Affecting Acceptance of Hospital Information Systems: A Nursing Perspective , 2011, The journal of nursing research : JNR.

[26]  A. S. Litwin.  Technological Change at Work: The Impact of Employee Involvement on the Effectiveness of Health Information Technology , 2011 .

[27]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  STARE-HI -Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics , 2009, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[28]  P. McCartney,et al.  Leadership in nursing informatics. , 2004, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[29]  A. Takian,et al.  Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology. , 2012, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[30]  Rachel Shapiro,et al.  Toward Understanding EHR Use in Small Physician Practices , 2009, Health care financing review.

[31]  J. Spetz.  Information Technology Implementation in a Rural Hospital: A Cautionary Tale , 2009, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[32]  Amany A. Abdrbo,et al.  Information Systems Use, Benefits, and Satisfaction among Ohio RNs , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[33]  Robert Unitan,et al.  Health care worker perspectives inform optimization of patient panel-support tools: a qualitative study. , 2013, Population health management.

[34]  Don Stewart,et al.  Executive management and IT innovation in health: identifying the barriers to adoption , 2007, Health Informatics J..

[35]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  Howard Balshem,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  J Brender,et al.  STARE-HI – Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics , 2013, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[38]  Fiona Godlee.  Cut to the core , 2013 .

[39]  Saeed Akhlaghpour,et al.  Review: Health information technologies in geriatrics and gerontology: a mixed systematic review , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[40]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Technology Competence of Business Managers: A Definition and Research Model , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Ping Yu,et al.  Different usage of the same oncology information system in two hospitals in Sydney - Lessons go beyond the initial introduction , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[42]  D. Chou.  Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care , 2012 .

[43]  B. Wheatley,et al.  Transforming care delivery through health information technology. , 2013, The Permanente journal.

[44]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Triple Take on Information System Implementation , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[46]  J. Øvretveit,et al.  Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[47]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[48]  J. Spetz,et al.  What determines successful implementation of inpatient information technology systems? , 2012, The American journal of managed care.

[49]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  Information Systems Use: Construct conceptualization and scale development , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  P. Spurgeon,et al.  Comprar Medical leadership. From the dark side to centre stage | Ham, C. | 9781846192463 | Radcliffe Publishing , 2011 .

[51]  David Lewin,et al.  Advances in Industrial & Labor Relations , 2009 .

[52]  Deena J Chisolm,et al.  The Role of Cognitive and Learning Theories in Supporting Successful EHR System Implementation Training , 2012, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[53]  Lampros K. Stergioulas,et al.  Health Information Systems Adoption: Findings from a Systematic Review , 2007, MedInfo.

[54]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Drivers and Barriers in Health IT Adoption , 2012, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[55]  Thomas H. Payne,et al.  A cross-site qualitative study of physician order entry. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[56]  M. Stewart,et al.  Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. , 2008, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[57]  S. Shortell,et al.  Implementation of electronic medical records in hospitals: two case studies. , 2007, Health policy.

[58]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[59]  Cheryl L Damberg,et al.  Adopting information technology to drive improvements in patient safety: lessons from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality health information technology grantees. , 2009, Health services research.

[60]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[61]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation. , 2011, Informatics in primary care.

[62]  D. Bates,et al.  Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[63]  Josivania Silva Farias,et al.  Innovation in Brazilian and Spanish hospitals: the managers perception upon electronic patient record , 2012 .

[64]  Jalila Jbilou,et al.  Combining Communication Technology Utilization and Organizational Innovation: Evidence from Canadian Healthcare Decision Makers , 2009, Journal of Medical Systems.

[65]  Peter A Cameron,et al.  A review of hospital characteristics associated with improved performance. , 2012, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[66]  Ariel C. Avgar,et al.  Dual Alignment of Industrial Relations Activity: From Strategic Choice to Mutual Gains , 2009 .

[67]  Peter Spurgeon,et al.  Is management essential to improving the performance and sustainability of health care systems and organizations? A systematic review and a roadmap for future studies. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[68]  S. Solimeo,et al.  Medical homes require more than an EMR and aligned incentives. , 2013, The American journal of managed care.

[69]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. , 2011, Health affairs.

[70]  Farah Magrabi,et al.  Patient safety problems associated with heathcare information technology: an analysis of adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[71]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[72]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[73]  Ruth Ellen Bulger,et al.  The Institute of Medicine , 1992, JAMA.

[74]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Hospital organization culture, capacity to innovate and success in technology adoption. , 2006, Journal of health organization and management.

[75]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Metastructuration actions of management: critical for stakeholder intervention in IS/IT implementations , 2012 .

[76]  Melissa M. Honour,et al.  Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. , 2004, Health affairs.

[77]  C. Feifer,et al.  Implementing change in primary care practices using electronic medical records: a conceptual framework , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[78]  Thomas E. Norris,et al.  Informatics in Primary Care , 2002, Health Informatics.