Technology, civic engagement and street science: hacking the future of participatory street design in the era of self-driving cars

Emerging technologies are fundamentally changing how we plan, develop, and manage our cities. Given trends of increasing mobile use, local governments are being required to adopt and use new technologies to plan, communicate and engage with citizens. In this context, this study then hypothesizes how technology trends will continue to impact planning and local government using the case of the participatory planning application ReStreet.com (app.restreet.com), a tool for visioning the future of streets in a future of autonomous or self-driving vehicles. While other work has detailed the importance of technology in the participatory process, this tool provides an example of how methods of digital representation and new technology can enrich community participation and democratize the planning process.

[1]  Regina R. Clewlow,et al.  Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States , 2017 .

[2]  E. Seltzer,et al.  Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing , 2013 .

[3]  David Simpson,et al.  Virtual Reality and Urban Simulation in Planning: A Literature Review and Topical Bibliography , 2001 .

[4]  W. Riggs,et al.  No Business as Usual in an Autonomous Vehicle Future , 2016 .

[5]  Todd Litman,et al.  Changing North American vehicle-travel price sensitivities: Implications for transport and energy policy , 2013 .

[6]  William Riggs,et al.  How is mobile technology changing city planning? Developing a taxonomy for the future , 2017 .

[7]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  The convergence of GIS and social media: challenges for GIScience , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  J. Katz.  Social and organizational consequences of wireless communications: a selective analysis of residential and business sectors in the United States , 1997 .

[9]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Projecting travelers into a world of self-driving vehicles: estimating travel behavior implications via a naturalistic experiment , 2018, Transportation.

[10]  Bill Pitkin,et al.  A Historical Perspective of Technology and Planning , 2012 .

[11]  Gerard Goggin,et al.  Mobile phones and community development: a contact zone between media and citizenship , 2009 .

[12]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Toward robotic cars , 2010, CACM.

[13]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[14]  Christopher J. Seeger,et al.  The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process , 2008 .

[15]  A. Townsend.  Life in the Real-Time City: Mobile Telephones and Urban Metabolism , 2000 .

[16]  William W Riggs,et al.  City Planning Department Technology Benchmarking Survey 2017 , 2015 .

[17]  Huadong Guo,et al.  Digital Earth 2020: towards the vision for the next decade , 2012, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[18]  R. Curtis.  The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life , 1992 .

[19]  Stephen Zoepf,et al.  A New Policy Agenda for Autonomous Vehicles: It's Time to Lead Innovation , 2017 .

[20]  William W Riggs,et al.  Thinking Beyond the (Autonomous) Vehicle: The Promise of Saved Lives , 2016 .

[22]  Nelson Chan,et al.  Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Facilitate the First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections , 2016 .

[23]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  The Quantified Traveler: Changing Transport Behavior with Personalized Travel Data Feedback , 2012 .

[24]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Driverless: Intelligent Cars and the Road Ahead , 2016 .

[25]  William W Riggs,et al.  Modeling Future Street Options in an AV Future Using Restreet , 2017 .

[26]  Caroline Bassett,et al.  How Many Movements? Mobile Telephones and Transformations in , 2005 .

[27]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[28]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Rethinking the Street in an Era of Driverless Cars , 2018 .

[29]  Aaron Parker Ray,et al.  Planning Connected: Using Online Social Networks to Improve Knowledge about Places and Communities , 2011 .

[30]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley.  Planning in the Real-Time City: The Future of Mobile Technology , 2010 .

[31]  Nelson Baloian,et al.  Mobile, Collaborative Situated Knowledge Creation for Urban Planning , 2012, Sensors.

[32]  Catherine Lee Rassman.  Regulating Rideshare Without Stifling Innovation: Examining the Drivers, the Insurance "Gap," and Why Pennsylvania Should Get on Board , 2015 .

[33]  Erick Guerra,et al.  Planning for Cars That Drive Themselves , 2016 .

[34]  Jan Fernback,et al.  Urban Planning Unplugged: How Wireless Mobile Technology Is Influencing Design Elements in Seven Major U.S. Cities , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  CORE NETWORKS, SOCIAL ISOLATION, AND NEW MEDIA , 2011 .

[36]  Scott A. Bollens,et al.  Urban Planners” Skills and Competencies , 2003 .

[37]  K. Gergen.  The saturated self : dilemmas of identity in contemporary life , 1991 .

[38]  R. Cervero,et al.  Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco , 2016 .

[39]  Carissa Schively Slotterback,et al.  Planners' Perspectives on Using Technology in Participatory Processes , 2011 .

[40]  William Riggs,et al.  Mobile responsive websites and local planning departments in the US: Opportunities for the future , 2017 .

[41]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley,et al.  Microparticipation with Social Media for Community Engagement in Transportation Planning , 2012 .

[42]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley,et al.  The growth of e-government in municipal planning , 2006 .

[43]  L. Srivastava,et al.  Mobile phones and the evolution of social behaviour , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..