Supporting business intelligence by providing ontology-based end-user information self-service

Business users need to analyse changing sets of information to effectively support their working tasks. Due to the complexity of enterprise systems and available tools, especially technically unskilled users face considerable challenges when trying to flexibly retrieve needed data in an ad-hoc manner. As a consequence, available data is limited to information artefacts like queries or reports which have been predefined for them by IT experts. To improve information self-service capabilities of business users, we present an ontology-based architecture and end-user tool, enabling easy data access and query creation for business users. Our approach is based on a semantic middleware integrating data from heterogeneous information systems and providing a comprehensible data model in the form of a business level ontology (BO). We show how our end-user tool Semantic Query Designer (SQD) enables convenient navigation and query building upon the BO, and illustrate its usage and the processing of data over all layers of our system architecture in detail, using a comprehensible use case example. As flexible query creation is a crucial precondition of leveraging the usage of enterprise data, we contribute to the enablement of business users of making better informed decisions, thus increasing effectiveness and efficiency of business processes.

[1]  Ben Light,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? A Field Study of Challenges in Business Intelligence Enabled Enterprise System Environments , 2007, ECIS.

[2]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Handbook on Ontologies , 2004, Künstliche Intell..

[3]  Jorge S. Cardoso,et al.  Using Semantic Web Technologies to Build Adaptable Enterprise Information Systems , 2006, Int. J. Interoperability Bus. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Volker Wulf,et al.  End User Development of Information Artefacts: A Design Challenge for Enterprise Systems , 2008, ECIS.

[5]  Maurizio Lenzerini,et al.  Data integration: a theoretical perspective , 2002, PODS.

[6]  Ralph Kimball,et al.  The Data Warehouse Toolkit: The Complete Guide to Dimensional Modeling , 1996 .

[7]  Steffen Staab,et al.  OntoEdit: Multifaceted Inferencing for Ontology Engineering , 2003, J. Data Semant..

[8]  Dimitrios Skoutas,et al.  Designing ETL processes using semantic web technologies , 2006, DOLAP '06.

[9]  Jürgen Angele,et al.  Data Integration using Semantic Technology: A use case , 2006, 2006 Second International Conference on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web (RuleML'06).

[10]  Alberto Abelló,et al.  Automating multidimensional design from ontologies , 2007, DOLAP '07.

[11]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[12]  Arne Beckhaus,et al.  Enhancing Just-in-Time E-Learning Through Machine Learning on Desktop Context Sensors , 2007, CONTEXT.

[13]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Ontology-Based Integration of Information - A Survey of Existing Approaches , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[14]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontobroker: Ontology Based Access to Distributed and Semi-Structured Information , 1999, DS-8.

[15]  Veronika Stefanov,et al.  Explaining Data Warehouse Data to Business Users - A Model-Based Approach to Business Metadata , 2007, ECIS.

[16]  Michael Kifer,et al.  Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages , 1995, JACM.

[17]  Volker Wulf,et al.  End User Development: Approaches Towards a Flexible Software Design , 2008, ECIS.