The origin of the genetic code cannot be studied using measurements based on the PAM matrix because this matrix reflects the code itself, making any such analyses tautologous.

Freeland et al. (Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000 a, 17, 511–518) have recently used a transformation of the PAM 74-100 matrix to study the level of optimization reached during genetic code origin. Since the PAM matrix counts the amino acid substitutions that occurred in families of homologous proteins during molecular evolution and as this process is mediated by the genetic code structure itself, it could be that the influence of the code on this matrix is such as to make any conclusion insignificant. As will be shown in the present paper, the transformation of the PAM matrix is affected in a non-marginal way by the organization of the genetic code and, thus, renders the analysis of Freeland et al. tautologous. Although, under the hypothesis of a highly optimized genetic code, some correlations may be expected between a measurement of similarity between amino acids and the genetic code structure, no certain conclusions can be drawn for the measurement used by Freeland et al.

[1]  L. Hurst,et al.  The Genetic Code Is One in a Million , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[2]  R S Root-Bernstein.  On the origin of the genetic code. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  David H. Ardell,et al.  On Error Minimization in a Sequential Origin of the Standard Genetic Code , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[4]  M. Giulio.  On the origin of the genetic code. , 1992 .

[5]  Massimo Di Giulio,et al.  Genetic code origin and the strength of natural selection. , 2000 .

[6]  J. Wong,et al.  Role of minimization of chemical distances between amino acids in the evolution of the genetic code. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Rates of Conservative and Radical Nonsynonymous Nucleotide Substitutions in Mammalian Nuclear Genes , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[8]  C. Woese,et al.  On the fundamental nature and evolution of the genetic code. , 1966, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[9]  M. Di Giulio,et al.  The Historical Factor: The Biosynthetic Relationships Between Amino Acids and Their Physicochemical Properties in the Origin of the Genetic Code , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[10]  L F Landweber,et al.  Measuring adaptation within the genetic code. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[11]  L. Hurst,et al.  Early fixation of an optimal genetic code. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  CHARLES J. EPSTEIN,et al.  Non-randomness of Ammo-acid Changes in the Evolution of Homologous Proteins , 1967, Nature.

[13]  W. Fitch,et al.  The phylogeny of tRNA sequences provides evidence for ambiguity reduction in the origin of the genetic code. , 1987, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[14]  C. Epstein,et al.  Role of the Amino-Acid ‘Code’ and of Selection for Conformation in the Evolution of Proteins , 1966, Nature.

[15]  Mario Medugno,et al.  Physicochemical Optimization in the Genetic Code Origin as the Number of Codified Amino Acids Increases , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[16]  R. Grantham.  Amino Acid Difference Formula to Help Explain Protein Evolution , 1974, Science.

[17]  M. R. Capobianco,et al.  On the optimization of the physicochemical distances between amino acids in the evolution of the genetic code. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  S A Benner,et al.  Amino acid substitution during functionally constrained divergent evolution of protein sequences. , 1994, Protein engineering.