Retrospective Assessment of Salvage to 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Who Failed Traditional SCS Therapy: RESCUE Study

Background and Objectives A randomized clinical trial demonstrated that 10 kHz SCS (10kHz-SCS) therapy is superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS) at 12- and 24-month clinical follow-ups and led to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the therapy. The results of the study led our practices to trial 10kHz-SCS in patients who had not maintained pain relief with LF-SCS therapy. Here, we report a large set of data from two clinical sites to assess if 10kHz-SCS is an effective salvage modality when LF-SCS fails. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 120 patients across two clinical sites who had LF-SCS implants and were salvaged with 10kHz-SCS. Results Data were analyzed from 105 patients between 28 and 90 years old (median 60) with chronic pain for 13.6 years. The mean duration of LF-SCS therapy was 4.66±3.9 years. The average Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased from 8.30±1.4 (median of 8) cm to 3.32±2.0 (median of 3) cm at 12 months and 3.36±2.0 (median of 3) cm at the most recent clinic visit (p<0.001) following salvage therapy. Pain relief of 50% or more was obtained in 85 out of 105 (81%) patients. Opioid usage decreased from 60.3±77.1 mg to 32.1±44.0 mg MSO4 equivalents (p = 0.001) at 12 months after salvage therapy. Conclusion Eighty-one percent of patient cases reviewed, where LF-SCS had failed, achieved >50% pain relief with 10kHz-SCS, and almost all exhibited some clinical improvement. Therefore, 10kHz-SCS should be considered an appropriate option to rescue failed LF-SCS.

[1]  D. Caraway,et al.  10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of non‐surgical refractory back pain: subanalysis of pooled data from two prospective studies , 2020, Anaesthesia.

[2]  T. Simopoulos,et al.  The Evolving Role of High‐Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation as Salvage Therapy in Neurostimulation , 2020, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[3]  K. Slavin,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of Spine Neurostimulation Therapies for the Treatment of Pain. , 2020, Pain medicine.

[4]  Zachary B. Kagan,et al.  Low-intensity, Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Differently Affects Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in the Rodent Superficial Dorsal Horn , 2019, Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Caraway,et al.  Opioid‐sparing effects of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation: a review of clinical evidence , 2019, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  D. Caraway,et al.  10 kHz SCS therapy for chronic pain, effects on opioid usage: Post hoc analysis of data from two prospective studies , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[7]  T. Simopoulos,et al.  High‐Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Series of Patients With or Without Previous Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation , 2019, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[8]  L. Kapural,et al.  Long-term efficacy of 1–1.2 kHz subthreshold spinal cord stimulation following failed traditional spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective case series , 2018, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[9]  S. Palmisani,et al.  Prospective, Randomized, Sham‐Control, Double Blind, Crossover Trial of Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation at Various Kilohertz Frequencies in Subjects Suffering From Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (SCS Frequency Study) , 2018, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[10]  M. Oh,et al.  Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation: Motives for Removal of Surgically Placed Paddle Systems , 2018, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[11]  T. Deer,et al.  Multicenter Retrospective Study of Neurostimulation With Exit of Therapy by Explant , 2017, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[12]  B. T. Sitzman,et al.  Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[13]  J. Pilitsis,et al.  Predictors of Spinal Cord Stimulation Success , 2015, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[14]  Thomas L Yearwood,et al.  Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Superior to Traditional Low-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: The SENZA-RCT Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Anesthesiology.

[15]  J. Pilitsis,et al.  Successful Use of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Following Traditional Treatment Failure , 2015, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[16]  S. Palmisani,et al.  High‐Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter European Clinical Study , 2013, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.