Effects of high frequency electrical stimulation on nerve's conduction of action potentials

Effects of high frequency (HF) electrical stimulation on bullfrog's sciatic nerve were evaluated by analyzing the changes of maximum conducting velocities and amplitudes of compound action potentials (CAPs) recorded after a period (5s or 60s) of HF (5 kHz) electrical stimulation, during which nerve's conduction of action potentials were blocked. The results showed that both conducting velocity and amplitude of CAPs decreased significantly when the induced action potential was crossing the position where HF electrical current had been delivered. The influenced CAPs tended to recover to their normal shape, which usually needed a time of at least 60s. HF stimulation of longer duration (60s, in contrast to 5s duration) affected conducting velocity more than CAPs' amplitude. However, HF stimulation of higher intensity (1.7 mA, in contrast to 0.55 mA) presented relative large influences on CAPs' amplitude, which exhibited slower recovering speed than conducting velocity. The results implicated that high frequency electrical current would introduce damaging effects to nerves to be stimulated, and suggested that safety problem be taken into account and new safe current delivering methods be designed to avoid the side effects before using high frequency electrical current to block nerve conduction clinically.

[1]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Orderly stimulation of skeletal muscle motor units with tripolar nerve cuff electrode , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Moshe Solomonow,et al.  External Control of the Neuromuscular System , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  D. Mcneal,et al.  Response of single alpha motoneurons to high-frequency pulse trains. Firing behavior and conduction block phenomenon. , 1986, Applied neurophysiology.

[4]  D. McCreery,et al.  Relationship between stimulus amplitude, stimulus frequency and neural damage during electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve of cat , 1995, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  Changfeng Tai,et al.  Block of external urethral sphincter contraction by high frequency electrical stimulation of pudendal nerve. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[6]  M Y WOO,et al.  ASYNCHRONOUS FIRING AND BLOCK OF PERIPHERAL NERVE CONDUCTION BY 20 KC ALTERNATING CURRENT. , 1964, Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society.

[7]  D. McCreery,et al.  Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradaic and capacitor electrodes , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  M M Elhilali,et al.  Reduction of bladder outlet resistance by selective sacral root stimulation using high-frequency blockade in dogs: an acute study. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[9]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  J. A. TANNER,et al.  Reversible Blocking of Nerve Conduction by Alternating-Current Excitation , 1962, Nature.

[11]  Changfeng Tai,et al.  Voiding reflex in chronic spinal cord injured cats induced by stimulating and blocking pudendal nerves , 2007, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[12]  Narendra Bhadra,et al.  Bladder voiding by combined high frequency electrical pudendal nerve block and sacral root stimulation , 2008, Neurourology and urodynamics.