Attitudes and Behaviors of Primary Care Physicians Regarding Tight Control of Blood Glucose in IDDM Patients

OBJECTIVE To evaluate attitudes and practices of primary-care physicians toward tight blood glucose control in IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A mail and telephone questionnaire survey was conducted on a systematic, stratified sample of 1429 family-practice physicians, general practitioners, internists, and pediatricians in active practice in the United States who treated patients with IDDM. Physicians were asked about methods they used for clinical and laboratory assessment of blood glucose control and about their attitudes and beliefs in treating IDDM. They were asked also what they consider to be acceptable ranges for blood glucose and HbA1 in IDDM patients. A score was developed reflecting three criteria for tight blood glucose control: fasting glucose 70–120 mg/dl (3.9–6.7 mM), 2-h postprandial glucose <180 mg/dl (<10 mM), and HbA1 <8% (the nondiabetic value was specified as 5–7%). Physicians were accorded one point when their acceptable range agreed with an intensive treatment criterion (range for score 0–3). RESULTS Only 31% of physicians agreed with all three criteria for tight control of blood glucose; 37% agreed with none or only one of the standards. Pediatricians were particularly low in their agreement with the HbA1 standard. Physicians who agreed with one of the three criteria often did not agree with the other two. With increasing value for the score, there was a greater proportion of physicians whose management practices (e.g., frequent measurement of HbA1 multiple insulin injections, patient SMBG, use of dietitian/educator in care of patients) are conducive toward tight control of blood glucose. However, even among physicians with a score of 3, HbA1 was ordered infrequently, three or more insulin injections/day was prescribed rarely, patient SMBG was less than fully endorsed, and both a dietitian and diabetes educator were used by a minority of physicians. CONCLUSIONS It appears that primary-care physicians are not fully aware of recommended criteria for intensive treatment of blood glucose in IDDM patients or of the importance of multiple insulin injections, use of HbA1; and patient SMBG. Physician practice behaviors are less than optimal for intensive management of IDDM patients, even among physicians who agree with all three standards for intensive treatment of blood glucose in IDDM.

[1]  Richard Barnett,et al.  Diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.

[2]  P. Houts,et al.  Reported Practice Behaviors for Medical Care of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus by Primary-Care Physicians in Pennsylvania , 1991, Diabetes Care.

[3]  Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial. The DCCT Research Group. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[4]  Irl B Hirsch,et al.  Intensive Insulin Therapy for Treatment of Type I Diabetes , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[5]  Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT): Update , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[6]  M. Harris,et al.  Testing for Blood Glucose by Office-Based Physicians in the U.S. , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[7]  R. Sandler,et al.  Fate of incorrectly addressed mailed questionnaires. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  W. K. Davis,et al.  Community Diabetes Care in the 1980s , 1988, Diabetes Care.

[9]  W. Knowler,et al.  Predisposition to hypertension and susceptibility to renal disease in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  H. Keen,et al.  Raised arterial pressure in parents of proteinuric insulin dependent diabetics. , 1987, British medical journal.

[11]  P. Bennett,et al.  Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Plasma Glucose Levels in U.S. Population Aged 20–74 Yr , 1987, Diabetes.

[12]  C. F. Merwe Blood glucose control and diabetic complications. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT): Design and Methodologic Considerations for the Feasibility Phase , 1986, Diabetes.

[14]  J. Wetzels,et al.  The changing natural history of nephropathy in type I diabetes. , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Cryer,et al.  Glucose counterregulation, hypoglycemia, and intensive insulin therapy in diabetes mellitus. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Kroccollaborativestudygroup Blood glucose control and the evolution of diabetic retinopathy and albuminuria. A preliminary multicenter trial. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Mazzuca,et al.  The role of physicians' knowledge and attitudes in effective diabetes management. , 1984, Social science & medicine.

[18]  P. Cryer,et al.  Identification of type I diabetic patients at increased risk for hypoglycemia during intensive therapy. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  T. Dornan,et al.  Genetic Susceptibility to the Development of Retinopathy in Insulin-dependent Diabetics , 1982, Diabetes.

[20]  Steno Study Group EFFECT OF 6 MONTHS OF STRICT METABOLIC CONTROL ON EYE AND KIDNEY FUNCTION IN INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETICS WITH BACKGROUND RETINOPATHY , 1982, The Lancet.

[21]  D. Pyke,et al.  Diabetic Retinopathy in Identical Twins , 1982, Diabetes.

[22]  C. Rittner,et al.  HLA-A, B, C, DR, Bf, and C2 alleles in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with proliferative retinopathy. , 1980, Immunobiology.

[23]  R. Ramsay,et al.  Histocompatibility antigen frequencies in diabetic retinopathy. , 1980, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  J. Pirart Diabetes Mellitus and Its Degenerative Complications: A Prospective Study of 4,400 Patients Observed Between 1947 and 1973 , 1978, Diabetes Care.

[25]  E. Eschwège,et al.  Effect of Multiple Daily Insulin Injections on the Course of Diabetic Retinopathy , 1976, Diabetes.