Performance Analysis of Distributed Decision Fusion Using A Multilevel Censoring Scheme in Wireless Sensor Networks

Sensor-censoring schemes have been widely applied to distributed detection to achieve the goal of energy saving in limited-energy wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In the traditional censoring scheme, the sensor transmits data to the fusion center (FC) only when the reliability is beyond a specified threshold, and hereby, energy saving is achieved. To further exploit the energy-efficiency capability of the censoring decision scheme, this paper proposes a new multilevel sensor-censoring scheme. As opposed to our earlier proposed three-region censoring scheme, the number of censoring levels in the proposed scheme is not restricted. A criterion on computing the reliability of the observation in each region is quantitatively determined, which controls the power of the signal transmitted to the FC. When the observation falls within the region with high reliability, the power of the transmitted signal is high, and vice versa. Both soft- and hard-decision fusion rules under the considered multilevel censoring strategy are investigated. For a given fusion rule, the main problem of this work is to minimize the error probability of the global decisions made by the FC by obtaining the best region allocation on the observation, which corresponds to the optimum multilevel censoring regions. The performance of the proposed multilevel censoring scheme is examined in terms of both energy saving and error performance. We compare the multilevel censoring scheme with the conventional scheme, which censors no sensor observations. The results show that the multilevel censoring scheme not only offers us a more flexible design of the censoring strategy but consumes much less energy as well, compared with the conventional scheme when the same error probability constraint is given. In addition, the obtained result shows that the superiority of the multilevel censoring scheme becomes more remarkable when the signal strength of the sensor observations is small.

[1]  V. Aalo,et al.  On distributed detection with correlated sensors: two examples , 1989 .

[2]  Tim Leinmüller,et al.  POSITION VERIFICATION APPROACHES FOR VEHICULAR AD HOC NETWORKS , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[3]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Distributed fusion in sensor networks: a graphical models perspective , 2006 .

[4]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Channel aware decision fusion in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[7]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Optimum distributed detection of weak signals in dependent sensors , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  On the Information Propagation Process in Mobile Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Jun Peng,et al.  A Distributed MAC Scheme for Emergency Message Dissemination in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Yu Hen Hu,et al.  Detection, classification, and tracking of targets , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[11]  Hung-Ta Pai,et al.  Equal-Gain Combination for adaptive distributed classification in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput..

[12]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Target classification and localization in habitat monitoring , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03)..

[13]  Tsang-Yi Wang,et al.  Performance Analysis of Distributed Decision Fusion Using a Censoring Scheme in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[14]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Asymptotic results for decentralized detection in power constrained wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  A.M. Sayeed,et al.  Data versus decision fusion for classification in sensor networks , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[16]  Venkateshwara R. Kanchumarthy,et al.  Impact of Channel Errors on Decentralized Detection Performance of Wireless Sensor Networks: A Study of Binary Modulations, Rayleigh-Fading and Nonfading Channels, and Fusion-Combiners , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Hung-Ta Pai.  Reliability-Based Adaptive Distributed Classification in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  Otman A. Basir,et al.  Traffic pattern detection in a partially deployed vehicular Ad Hoc network of vehicles , 2009, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[19]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Censoring sensors: a low-communication-rate scheme for distributed detection , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[20]  Robert Schober,et al.  Nonorthogonal Transmission and Noncoherent Fusion of Censored Decisions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[21]  Kuei-Chiang Lai,et al.  Fusion of Decisions Transmitted Over Flat Fading Channels Via Maximizing the Deflection Coefficient , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[22]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Detection and Data Fusion , 1996 .

[23]  Biao Chen,et al.  Fusion of censored decisions in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[24]  Mani Srivastava,et al.  Energy-aware wireless microsensor networks , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[25]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Fusion of decisions transmitted over Rayleigh fading channels in wireless sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.