Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE To examine the validity of the timed Up and Go (TUG) test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) by using a comprehensive framework based on construct validity (ie, convergent and divergent validity). DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS Community-residing persons with MS (N=47). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Main outcome measures included the TUG test, timed 25-foot walk test, 6-minute walk test, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument, posturography evaluation, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Symbol Digits Modalities Test, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and the number of steps taken per day. RESULTS The TUG test was strongly associated with other valid outcome measures of ambulatory mobility (Spearman rank correlation, rs=.71-.90) and disability status (rs=.80), moderately to strongly associated with balance confidence (rs=.66), and weakly associated with postural control (ie, balance) (rs=.31). The TUG test was moderately associated with cognitive processing speed (rs=.59), but not associated with other nonambulatory measures (ie, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument-upper extremity function). CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the validity of the TUG test as a measure of functional mobility. This warrants its inclusion in patients' assessment alongside other valid measures of functional mobility in both clinical and research practice in persons with MS.

[1]  P J Holliday,et al.  Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  S. Coote,et al.  Core outcome measures for exercise studies in people with multiple sclerosis: recommendations from a multidisciplinary consensus meeting , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[3]  R. Motl,et al.  Neurological disability and its association with walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: brief review. , 2014, Neurodegenerative disease management.

[4]  L. von Koch,et al.  Health-related quality of life in a population-based sample of people with multiple sclerosis in Stockholm County , 2006, Multiple sclerosis.

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Véronique Sébille,et al.  Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures , 2014, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[7]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  A. Forsberg,et al.  Activities-Specific Balance Confidence in People with Multiple Sclerosis , 2012, Multiple sclerosis international.

[9]  R. Motl,et al.  Accelerometry as a measure of walking behavior in multiple sclerosis , 2013, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[10]  Davide Cattaneo,et al.  Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Improving standards in brain-behavior correlation analyses , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  L. Pientka,et al.  Falls and EQ-5D rated quality of life in community-dwelling seniors with concurrent chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study , 2014, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[13]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[14]  N. Larocca.  Impact of Walking Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis , 2011, The patient.

[15]  R. Motl.  Ambulation and multiple sclerosis. , 2013, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[16]  R. Motl,et al.  Further validation of the Six-Spot Step Test as a measure of ambulation in multiple sclerosis. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[17]  L. Rochester,et al.  Walking in the real world: concepts related to functional gait , 2007 .

[18]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  G. Widener,et al.  Selecting Rehabilitation Outcome Measures for People with Multiple Sclerosis. , 2015, International journal of MS care.

[20]  Robert W Motl,et al.  Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis , 2013, BMC Neurology.

[21]  E. McAuley,et al.  Validity, invariance and responsiveness of a self-report measure of functional limitations and disability in multiple sclerosis , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation.

[22]  David A Bennett,et al.  Cognitive function is associated with the development of mobility impairments in community-dwelling elders. , 2011, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[23]  Carlo Pozzilli,et al.  Assessing walking disability in multiple sclerosis , 2012, Multiple sclerosis.

[24]  H. Staehelin,et al.  Better functional mobility in community-dwelling elderly is related to D-hormone serum levels and to daily calcium intake. , 2005, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.

[25]  B Isaacs,et al.  Clinical and laboratory studies of falls in old people. Prospects for prevention. , 1985, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[26]  A J Thompson,et al.  Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability , 2003, Neurology.

[27]  P. Sørensen,et al.  The Six Spot Step Test: a new measurement for walking ability in multiple sclerosis , 2006, Multiple sclerosis.

[28]  R. Motl,et al.  Cognitive processing speed is related to fall frequency in older adults with multiple sclerosis. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  Robert W Motl,et al.  Further validation of multiple sclerosis walking scale-12 scores based on spatiotemporal gait parameters. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  J. Kurtzke.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[31]  R. Marrie,et al.  Impact of loss of mobility on instrumental activities of daily living and socioeconomic status in patients with MS , 2010, Current medical research and opinion.

[32]  Paul van Asch,et al.  Impact of Mobility Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis 2 - Patients’ Perspectives , 2011 .

[33]  W H Eisma,et al.  The Timed "up and go" test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  J. Norton,et al.  The significant change for the Timed 25-Foot Walk in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite , 2000, Multiple sclerosis.

[35]  Jacob J. Sosnoff,et al.  Mobility, Balance and Falls in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis , 2011, PloS one.

[36]  R. Benedict,et al.  Risk factors for and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis , 2011, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[37]  G. Green,et al.  'Restricting choices and limiting independence': social and economic impact of multiple sclerosis upon households by level of disability , 2008, Chronic illness.

[38]  L. Gunnarsson,et al.  Clinical relevance using timed walk tests and 'timed up and go' testing in persons with multiple sclerosis. , 2007, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.