Two-wave panel analysis: Comparing statistical methods for studying the effects of transitions.

Study of the effect of transitions on individual and family outcomes is central to understanding families over the life course. There is little consensus, however, on the appropriate statistical methods needed to study transitions in panel data. This article compares lagged dependent variable (LDV) and change score (CS) methods for analyzing the effect of events in two-wave panel data. The methods are described, and their performances are compared both with a simulation and a substantive example using the National Survey of Families and Households two-wave panel. The results suggest that CS methods have advantages over LDV techniques in estimating the effect of events on outcomes in two-wave panel data.

[1]  George W. Bohrnstedt,et al.  Observations on the Measurement of Change , 1969 .

[2]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  L. Whitbeck,et al.  The effects of unequal covariances and reliabilities on contemporaneous inference : the case of hostility and marital happiness , 1995 .

[4]  G. Firebaugh,et al.  Does Economic Growth Benefit the Masses? Growth, Dependence, and Welfare in the Third World , 1994 .

[5]  L. Cronbach,et al.  How we should measure "change": Or should we? , 1970 .

[6]  E. C. Dalrymple-Alford.  Measurement of clustering in free recall. , 1970 .

[7]  J. Mirowsky,et al.  Age, Depression, and Attrition in the National Survey of Families and Households , 2000 .

[8]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Introduction: Beyond the Identification Problem , 1985 .

[9]  D. Umberson,et al.  Marital Status, Marital Transitions, and Health: A Gendered Life Course Perspective∗ , 2004, Journal of health and social behavior.

[10]  David R. Johnson.  Panel Analysis in Family Studies. , 1988 .

[11]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Events , 1994 .

[12]  L. Waite,et al.  Health in household context: living arrangements and health in late middle age. , 2002, Journal of health and social behavior.

[13]  O. D. Duncan.  Testing Key Hypotheses in Panel Analysis , 1980 .

[14]  P. Allison.  CHANGE SCORES AS DEPENDENT VARIABLES IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS , 1990 .

[15]  Otis Dudley Duncan,et al.  Unmeasured Variables in Linear Models for Panel Analysis , 1972 .

[16]  G. Bohrnstedt,et al.  Robustness in Regression Analysis , 1971 .

[17]  J M Neuhaus,et al.  Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses , 1992, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  L. Radloff.  The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[19]  Zheng Wu,et al.  The effects of marital and nonmarital union transition on health , 2002 .

[20]  David R. Johnson,et al.  Sampling Design Effects: Do They Affect the Analyses of Data from the National Survey of Families and Households? , 1998 .

[21]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Problems in Estimating Measurement Error From Panel Data , 1976 .

[22]  David R. Johnson,et al.  Alternative methods for the quantitative analysis of panel data in family research : pooled time-series models , 1995 .

[23]  Guillermina Jasso,et al.  MARITAL COITAL FREQUENCY AND THE PASSAGE OF TIME: ESTIMATING THE SEPARATE EFFECTS OF SPOUSES' AGES AND MARITAL DURATION, BIRTH AND MARRIAGE COHORTS, AND PERIOD INFLUENCES* , 1985 .

[24]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Panel Data and Models of Change: A Comparison of First Difference and Conventional Two-Wave Models , 1985 .

[25]  Jian Wu,et al.  An Empirical Test of Crisis, Social Selection, and Role Explanations of the Relationship Between Marital Disruption and Psychological Distress: A Pooled Time‐Series Analysis of Four‐Wave Panel Data , 2002 .