Test Validity in Cognitive Assessment

INTRODUCTION Scientific theories can be viewed as attempts to explain phenomena by showing how they would arise, if certain assumptions concerning the structure of the world were true. Such theories invariably involve a reference to theoretical entities and attributes. Theoretical attributes include such things as electrical charge and distance in physics, inclusive fitness and selective pressure in biology, brain activity and anatomic structure in neuroscience, and intelligence and developmental stages in psychology. These attributes are not subject to direct observation but require an inferential process by which the researcher infers positions of objects on the attribute on the basis of a set of observations. To make such inferences, one needs to have an idea of how different observations map on to different positions on the attribute (which, after all, is not itself observable). This requires a measurement model. A measurement model explicates how the structure of theoretical attributes relates to the structure of observations. For instance, a measurement model for temperature may stipulate how the level of mercury in a thermometer is systematically related to temperature, or a measurement model for intelligence may specify how IQ scores are related to general intelligence. The reliance on a process of measurement and the associated measurement model usually involves a degree of uncertainty; the researcher assumes, but cannot know for sure, that a measurement procedure is appropriate in a given situation.

[1]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Two interpretations of the discrimination parameter , 2005 .

[2]  Conor V Dolan,et al.  Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: a question of measurement invariance. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  W. Popham Consequential validity: Right Concern‐Wrong Concept , 2005 .

[4]  Conor V Dolan,et al.  Discrete Latent Markov Models for Normally Distributed Response Data , 2005, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  Constrained and Unconstrained Multivariate Normal Finite Mixture Modeling of Piagetian Data , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory , 2002 .

[8]  D. Kaplan Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions , 2000 .

[9]  Paul E. Meehl,et al.  The dynamics of "structured" personality tests. , 2000 .

[10]  John S. Uebersax,et al.  Probit Latent Class Analysis with Dichotomous or Ordered Category Measures: Conditional Independence/Dependence Models , 1999 .

[11]  J. Michell Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept. , 1999 .

[12]  S. Messick Test Validity: A Matter of Consequence , 1998 .

[13]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  Statistical Test of the Rule Assessment Methodology by Latent Class Analysis , 1997 .

[14]  Roger E. Millsap,et al.  Invariance in measurement and prediction: Their relationship in the single-factor case. , 1997 .

[15]  J. Michell Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology , 1997 .

[16]  Gideon J. Mellenbergh,et al.  Measurement precision in test score and item response models , 1996 .

[17]  E. Maris Psychometric latent response models , 1995 .

[18]  G. J. Mellenbergh,et al.  A study on the convergent and discriminant validity of the Dental Anxiety Inventory. , 1995, Behaviour research and therapy.

[19]  W. Meredith Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[20]  W. Meredith,et al.  Inferential Conditions in the Statistical Detection of Measurement Bias , 1992 .

[21]  Jürgen Rost,et al.  Rasch Models in Latent Classes: An Integration of Two Approaches to Item Analysis , 1990 .

[22]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[23]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications , 1984 .

[24]  Willem J. van der Linden,et al.  The linear utility model for optimal selection , 1981 .

[25]  Willem J. van der Linden,et al.  Decision models for use with criterion-referenced tests , 1980 .

[26]  F. Lord Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems , 1980 .

[27]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  The Internal and External Optimality of Decisions Based on Tests , 1979 .

[28]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[29]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[30]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. , 1971 .

[31]  L. Cronbach Essentials of psychological testing , 1960 .

[32]  Harold P. Bechtoldt,et al.  Construct validity: A Critique. , 1959 .

[33]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Psychological tests and personnel decisions , 1958 .

[35]  J. Piaget The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[36]  J. Loevinger Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory , 1957 .

[37]  A. D. Vries The merit of ipsative measurement : second thoughts and minute doubts , 2006 .

[38]  P. Boeck,et al.  Explanatory item response models : a generalized linear and nonlinear approach , 2004 .

[39]  D. Borsboom,et al.  The concept of validity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[40]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[41]  S. Embretson,et al.  Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .

[42]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory , 1997 .

[43]  P. Oosterveld,et al.  Questionnaire design methods , 1996 .

[44]  G. J. Mellenbergh,et al.  Assessment of dental anxiety: A facet approach , 1993 .

[45]  R. Linn Educational measurement, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[46]  Gideon J. Mellenbergh,et al.  Item bias and item response theory , 1989 .

[47]  A. Gross,et al.  Defining a "fair" or "unbiased" selection model: A question of utilities. , 1975 .

[48]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.