The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem

Abstract The new orthodoxy in studies of policy dynamics is that policy change occurs through a homeostatic process. “Perturbations” occurring outside of an institutionalized policy subsystem, often characterized as some type of societal or political upheaval or learning, are critical for explaining the development of profound and durable policy changes which are otherwise limited by “endogenous” institutional stability. These homeostatic assumptions, while useful for assessing many cases of policy change, do not adequately capture the historical patterns of policy development found in many sectors. The roots of this problem are traced back to the origins of the new orthodoxy in comparative policy research whereby different levels (orders) of policy making have been incorrectly juxtaposed, providing a parsimonious, but sometimes empirically incorrect, view of policy change. Revising existing taxonomies of policy levels provides a superior identification of the processes of change, and uncovers more than one mechanism through which significant policy change can occur. Three of these alternative mechanisms – a “neo-homeostatic” one in which paradigmatic changes occur through endogenous shifts in goals; a “quasi-homeostatic” in which exogenous factors influence changes in objectives and settings; and a “thermostatic” one in which durable policy objectives require that settings adapt to exogenous changes – are discussed.

[1]  Philipp Genschel The Dynamics of Inertia: Institutional Persistence and Change in Telecommunications and Health Care , 1997 .

[2]  Elisabeth S. Clemens and,et al.  POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change , 1999 .

[3]  J. Hacker Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Richard Deeg,et al.  Institutional Change and the Uses and Limits of Path Dependence: The Case of German Finance , 2001 .

[5]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[6]  Stefan Kühner ESPA net/JESP Doctoral Researcher Prize Essay: Country-level comparisons of welfare state change measures: another facet of the dependent variable problem within the comparative analysis of the welfare state? , 2007 .

[7]  Jonathan Bendor,et al.  A Model of Muddling Through , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Stuart A. Lilie,et al.  Hard Issues, Core Values and Vertical Constraint: The Case of Nuclear Power , 1993, British Journal of Political Science.

[10]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Hard and Soft Law in International Governance , 2000, International Organization.

[11]  W. Streeck,et al.  Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies , 2005 .

[12]  R. Kent Weaver,et al.  Do Institutions Matter , 1992 .

[13]  S. Gould,et al.  Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered , 1977, Paleobiology.

[14]  B. Cashore,et al.  Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry , 2007 .

[15]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Managing the “hollow state”: procedural policy instruments and modern governance , 2000 .

[16]  G. Skogstad Ideas, Paradigms and Institutions: Agricultural Exceptionalism in the European Union and the United States , 1998 .

[17]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  In Search of Sustainability: British Columbia Forest Policy in the 1990s , 2000 .

[18]  Christopher Wlezien The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending , 1995 .

[19]  Markus Marterbauer Do institutions matter , 1994 .

[20]  Sven Steinmo,et al.  Structuring politics : historical institutionalism in comparative analysis , 1992 .

[21]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[22]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[23]  C. Green-Pedersen The Dependent Variable Problem within the Study of Welfare State Retrenchment: Defining the Problem and Looking for Solutions , 2004 .

[24]  Murray Gell-Mann,et al.  Complexity and Complex Adaptive Systems , 1992 .

[25]  P. Sabatier An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein , 1988 .

[26]  Ian S. Lustick Explaining the Variable Utility of Disjointed Incrementalism: Four Propositions , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[27]  Punctuated Equilibrium and Congressional Budgeting , 2006 .

[28]  David Strang,et al.  The International Diffusion of Public-Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning , 2006, International Organization.

[29]  C. Daugbjerg Policy feedback and paradigm shift in EU agricultural policy: the effects of the MacSharry reform on future reform , 2003 .

[30]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Policy Networks and Advocacy Coalitions: Explaining Policy Change and Stability in UK Industrial Pollution Policy? , 2000 .

[31]  M. Howlett,et al.  The Policy Effects of Internationalization: A Subsystem Adjustment Analysis of Policy Change , 2002 .

[32]  P. Mortensen Policy Punctuations in Danish Local Budgeting , 2005 .

[33]  D. Finegold How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[34]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[35]  M. Howlett,et al.  Deregulation and its discontents : rewriting the rules in Asia , 2006 .

[36]  P. Hall The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations , 1989 .

[37]  W. Buckley Society as a Complex Adaptive System , 2008 .

[38]  Marcel Hoogenboom,et al.  Hidden change: disaggregation of welfare state regimes for greater insight into welfare state change , 2007 .

[39]  M. T. Hayes,et al.  Incrementalism and Public Policy , 1991 .

[40]  Paul Pierson,et al.  Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies , 2002 .

[41]  T. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago (University of Chicago Press) 1962. , 1962 .

[42]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The Logic of Appropriateness , 2008 .

[43]  Michael M. Atkinson,et al.  Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks: Cumulative Change in Agriculture , 1996, Journal of Public Policy.

[44]  William D. Berry The Confusing Case of Budgetary Incrementalism: Too Many Meanings for a Single Concept , 1990, The Journal of Politics.

[45]  A. Kay,et al.  The Dynamics of Public Policy: Theory And Evidence , 2006 .

[46]  C. Daugbjerg Policy Networks And Agricultural Policy Reforms: Explaining Deregulation In Sweden And Re‐Regulation In The European Community , 1997 .

[47]  J. D. Liefferink The dynamics of policy arrangements: turning around the tetrahedron , 2006 .

[48]  Richard Rose,et al.  What is Lesson-Drawing? , 1991, Journal of Public Policy.

[49]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratization and Budget Change , 2007 .

[50]  P. Pierson Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[51]  Andrew C. Mertha,et al.  Unbuilt Dams: Seminal Events and Policy Change in China, Australia, and the United States , 2006 .

[52]  Paul Pierson,et al.  When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change , 1993, World Politics.

[53]  R. Durant,et al.  Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy: Lessons from the U.S. Foreign Policy Arena , 1989, Journal of Public Policy.

[54]  Giliberto Capano,et al.  Administrative Traditions and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform During the 1990s , 2003 .

[55]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[56]  J. Rayner,et al.  Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time , 2006 .

[57]  M. Howlett,et al.  Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems , 1996 .

[58]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[59]  K. Thelen Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: HOW INSTITUTIONS EVOLVE , 2003 .

[60]  Peter John,et al.  Policy punctuations in the UK: fluctuations and equilibria in central government expenditure since 1951 , 2003 .

[61]  D. Braun,et al.  Policy learning in Swiss research policy—the case of the National Centres of Competence in Research , 2003 .

[62]  J. Steinbruner The Cybernetic Theory of Decision: New Dimensions of Political Analysis , 1974 .

[63]  Lisa L. Martin,et al.  Institutional Effects on State Behavior: Convergence and Divergence , 2001 .

[64]  A. Vining,et al.  Policy analysis : concepts and practice , 1989 .

[65]  Kathleen Thelen,et al.  Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: HOW INSTITUTIONS EVOLVE , 2003 .

[66]  J. Mahoney Path dependence in historical sociology , 2000 .

[67]  D. Muthumuni,et al.  Models for Change , 2011, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[68]  R. J. O'Connor,et al.  Operationalizing Incrementalism: Measuring the Muddles , 1975 .

[69]  Berthold. Rittberger,et al.  The Creation, Interpretation and Contestation of Institutions - Revisiting Historical Institutionalism* , 2003 .

[70]  Christoph Knill The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence , 2001 .

[71]  S. Gould,et al.  Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism , 1972 .

[72]  J. Lindner Institutional stability and change: two sides of the same coin¹ , 2003 .

[73]  P. Hall Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[74]  J. Goldstone Initial Conditions, General Laws, Path Dependence, and Explanation in Historical Sociology1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .