Estimating the Degree of Neutrality in Fitness Landscapes by the Nei’s Standard Genetic Distance – An Application to Evolutionary Robotics –

In recent years, not only ruggedness but also neutrality has been recognized as an important feature of a fitness landscape for genetic search. As it has been reported that the evolutionary dynamics on a fitness landscape with neutrality is clearly different from the canonical explanations, ruggedness alone might be inadequate describing it. Another measure, i.e., neutrality is required. In this paper, we proposed the use of the Nei's standard genetic distance, which originates from population genetics, for estimating the degree of neutrality in fitness landscapes after minor modifications. Several computer simulations were conducted with an evolutionary robotics problem in order to investigate the validity of the proposed approach. The results suggest to us that the Nei's genetic distance is a reliable method for estimating the degree of neutrality on real-world problems.

[1]  Kazuhiro Ohkura,et al.  The Nei's standard genetic distance in artificial evolution , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753).

[2]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  On the Utility of Redundant Encodings in Mutation-Based Evolutionary Search , 2002, PPSN.

[3]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  Information Characteristics and the Structure of Landscapes , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[5]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Evolution of Spiking Neural Controllers for Autonomous Vision-Based Robots , 2001, EvoRobots.

[6]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithm Difficulty and the Modality of Fitness Landscapes , 1994, FOGA.

[7]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Toward the Evolution of Dynamical Neural Networks for Minimally Cognitive Behavior , 1996 .

[8]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The evolvability of artificial neural net-works for robot control , 2002 .

[9]  K. Ohkura,et al.  Tuning Genetic Algorithms for Problems Including Neutral Networks-The Simplest Case : The Balance Beam Function - , 2003 .

[10]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Statistical Dynamics of the Royal Road Genetic Algorithm , 1999, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[11]  P. Husbands,et al.  Neutral networks in an evolutionary robotics search space , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[12]  I. Harvey.  Artiicial Evolution for Real Problems , 1997 .

[13]  T. Smith,et al.  Neutrality and ruggedness in robot landscapes , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[14]  Bernard Manderick,et al.  The Genetic Algorithm and the Structure of the Fitness Landscape , 1991, ICGA.

[15]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Fitness Landscapes and Evolvability , 2002, Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  J. Crutchfield,et al.  Optimizing Epochal Evolutionary Search: Population-Size Dependent Theory , 1998, Machine-mediated learning.

[17]  Christopher J. Bishop,et al.  Pulsed Neural Networks , 1998 .

[18]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[19]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  The royal road for genetic algorithms: Fitness landscapes and GA performance , 1991 .

[20]  Franz Rothlauf,et al.  Redundant Representations in Evolutionary Computation , 2003, Evolutionary Computation.

[21]  Leila Kallel,et al.  Inside GA Dynamics: Ground Basis for Comparison , 1998, PPSN.

[22]  E. Weinberger,et al.  Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  M. Newman,et al.  Effects of selective neutrality on the evolution of molecular species , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  K. Holsinger.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution , 2004 .

[25]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  The Advantages of Landscape Neutrality in Digital Circuit Evolution , 2000, ICES.

[26]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Neutral Networks and Evolvability with Complex Genotype-Phenotype Mapping , 2001, ECAL.

[27]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  Genetic Distance between Populations , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Makoto Fujiyoshi.  Evolutionary Robotics from Intelligent Robots to Artificial Life , 1998 .

[29]  Marc Ebner,et al.  On neutral networks and evolvability , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[30]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[31]  K. Ohkura,et al.  Tuning Genetic Algorithms for Problems Including Neutral Networks-A More Complex Case : The Terraced NK Problem - , 2003 .

[32]  M. Kimura.  The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution: Introduction , 1983 .

[33]  L. Barnett.  TANGLED WEBS Evolutionary Dynamics on Fitness Landscapes with Neutrality , 1997 .

[34]  T. Ohta.  THE NEARLY NEUTRAL THEORY OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION , 1992 .

[35]  Kazuhiro Ohkura,et al.  An Approach to Evolutionary Robotics Using a Genetic Algorithm with a Variable Mutation Rate Strategy , 2004, PPSN.

[36]  J. Crutchfield,et al.  Optimizing Epochal Evolutionary Search: Population-Size Dependent Theory , 1998, Machine Learning.

[37]  Tomoko Ohta,et al.  Evolution by nearly-neutral mutations , 2004, Genetica.

[38]  Terry Jones,et al.  Fitness Distance Correlation as a Measure of Problem Difficulty for Genetic Algorithms , 1995, ICGA.

[39]  Wim Hordijk,et al.  A Measure of Landscapes , 1996, Evolutionary Computation.

[40]  Kazuhiro Ohkura,et al.  Artificial evolution of pulsed neural networks on the motion pattern classification system , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation for the New Millennium (Cat. No.03EX694).

[41]  P. Stadler.  Landscapes and their correlation functions , 1996 .

[42]  Adrian Thompson,et al.  An Evolved Circuit, Intrinsic in Silicon, Entwined with Physics , 1996, ICES.