Frequency and Predictors of Internal Mammary Artery Graft Failure and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes: Insights From the Project of Ex-vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection (PREVENT) IV Trial
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Mack | R. D. de Winter | E. Peterson | N. Kouchoukos | R. Lopes | J. Alexander | R. Harrington | P. Schulte | C. Gibson | Peter K. Smith | T. Ferguson | R. Harskamp | B. Englum | D. Wojdyla | R. Hager | Rebecca Hager | Peter K. Smith
[1] M. Mack,et al. Frequency and Predictors of Internal Mammary Artery Graft Failure and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes: Insights From the PREVENT IV Trial , 2015 .
[2] A. Go,et al. Adoption and effectiveness of internal mammary artery grafting in coronary artery bypass surgery among Medicare beneficiaries. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[3] D. Glineur,et al. Five-year follow-up of drug-eluting stents implantation vs minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery disease: a propensity score analysis. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[4] Renu Virmani,et al. Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? , 2013, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.
[5] I. White,et al. Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data , 2013, Statistical methods in medical research.
[6] R. D. de Winter,et al. Saphenous Vein Graft Failure After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Pathophysiology, Management, and Future Directions , 2013, Annals of surgery.
[7] Eric M. Reyes,et al. Edifoligide and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) 5-year results. , 2012, American heart journal.
[8] V. Chair,et al. ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011 .
[9] K. Grove,et al. Expression and function of endothelial nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and protein are higher in internal mammary than in radial arteries. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[10] Yujun Wu,et al. Fast FSR Variable Selection with Applications to Clinical Trials , 2009, Biometrics.
[11] S. Pocock,et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials , 2009, The Lancet.
[12] O. Penn,et al. Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[13] Prevent Iv Investigators. Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005 .
[14] Robert M Califf,et al. The PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) trial: study rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. , 2005, American heart journal.
[15] R. Califf,et al. Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.
[16] Robert J Anderson,et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[17] Uwe Siebert,et al. Long-Term Patency of Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafts: Relationship With Preoperative Severity of the Native Coronary Artery Stenosis , 2004, Circulation.
[18] N. Smedira,et al. Radial Artery Bypass Grafts Have an Increased Occurrence of Angiographically Severe Stenosis and Occlusion Compared With Left Internal Mammary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts , 2004, Circulation.
[19] Eugene H Blackstone,et al. Does competitive flow reduce internal thoracic artery graft patency? , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[20] A. Manzoli,et al. Severity of coronary artery stenosis at preoperative angiography and midterm mammary graft status. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[21] R. Villareal,et al. The string phenomenon: an important cause of internal mammary artery graft failure. , 2000, Texas Heart Institute journal.
[22] H. Manninen,et al. Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous grafts. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[23] Y. Ikari,et al. Effects of competitive blood flow on arterial graft patency and diameter. Medium-term postoperative follow-up. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[24] F. Loop. Internal-thoracic-artery grafts. Biologically better coronary arteries. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.
[25] F. Loop,et al. Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Comparison of left internal mammary artery and venous autograft at 18 to 20 years of follow-up. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[26] G. E. Green,et al. Clinical implications of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study experience. , 1988, Circulation.
[27] R. Virmani,et al. A comparison of morphologic and angiographic findings in long-term internal mammary artery and saphenous vein bypass grafts. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[28] W. C. Sheldon,et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.
[29] H. Kay,et al. Atherosclerosis of the internal mammary artery. , 1976, The Annals of thoracic surgery.