Evidence that Adaptation in Drosophila Is Not Limited by Mutation at Single Sites

Adaptation in eukaryotes is generally assumed to be mutation-limited because of small effective population sizes. This view is difficult to reconcile, however, with the observation that adaptation to anthropogenic changes, such as the introduction of pesticides, can occur very rapidly. Here we investigate adaptation at a key insecticide resistance locus (Ace) in Drosophila melanogaster and show that multiple simple and complex resistance alleles evolved quickly and repeatedly within individual populations. Our results imply that the current effective population size of modern D. melanogaster populations is likely to be substantially larger (≥100-fold) than commonly believed. This discrepancy arises because estimates of the effective population size are generally derived from levels of standing variation and thus reveal long-term population dynamics dominated by sharp—even if infrequent—bottlenecks. The short-term effective population sizes relevant for strong adaptation, on the other hand, might be much closer to census population sizes. Adaptation in Drosophila may therefore not be limited by waiting for mutations at single sites, and complex adaptive alleles can be generated quickly without fixation of intermediate states. Adaptive events should also commonly involve the simultaneous rise in frequency of independently generated adaptive mutations. These so-called soft sweeps have very distinct effects on the linked neutral polymorphisms compared to the standard hard sweeps in mutation-limited scenarios. Methods for the mapping of adaptive mutations or association mapping of evolutionarily relevant mutations may thus need to be reconsidered.

[1]  J. David,et al.  Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. , 1988, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[2]  Jeremy Schmutz,et al.  Widespread Parallel Evolution in Sticklebacks by Repeated Fixation of Ectodysplasin Alleles , 2005, Science.

[3]  D. Petrov,et al.  References and Notes Materials and Methods Tables S1 and S2 References and Notes Pesticide Resistance via Transposition-mediated Adaptive Gene Truncation in Drosophila , 2022 .

[4]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. , 1997, Genetics.

[5]  M. G. Kidwell Evolution of hybrid dysgenesis determinants in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Julio Rozas,et al.  DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis , 1999, Bioinform..

[7]  Marian Thomson,et al.  Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. , 2009, Genome research.

[8]  J. Gillespie The causes of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[9]  R. Lewontin,et al.  The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change , 2022 .

[10]  A. Mutero,et al.  Resistance-associated point mutations in insecticide-insensitive acetylcholinesterase. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  W N ALDRIDGE,et al.  Some properties of specific cholinesterase with particular reference to the mechanism of inhibition by diethyl p-nitrophenyl thiophosphate (E 605) and analogues. , 1950, The Biochemical journal.

[12]  S. Wright,et al.  The Distribution of Gene Frequencies Under Irreversible Mutation. , 1938, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Joseph K. Pickrell,et al.  The Role of Geography in Human Adaptation , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[14]  W. B. Watt Intragenic Recombination as a Source of Population Genetic Variability , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[15]  K. Crandall,et al.  TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[16]  D. Fournier,et al.  Acetylcholinesterase alterations reveal the fitness cost of mutations conferring insecticide resistance , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[17]  Richard R. Hudson,et al.  Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation , 2002, Bioinform..

[18]  J. Hemingway,et al.  Resistance‐associated point mutations of organophosphate insensitive acetylcholinesterase, in the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae , 2002, Insect molecular biology.

[19]  Markus Perola,et al.  Evidence of still-ongoing convergence evolution of the lactase persistence T-13910 alleles in humans. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  A. Devonshire,et al.  Identification and characterization of mutations in housefly (Musca domestica) acetylcholinesterase involved in insecticide resistance. , 2001, The Biochemical journal.

[21]  Y. Oguma,et al.  Negative Correlations Between Resistance to Three Organophosphate Insecticides and Productivity Within a Natural Population of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) , 2002, Journal of economic entomology.

[22]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Population Genomics: Whole-Genome Analysis of Polymorphism and Divergence in Drosophila simulans , 2007, PLoS biology.

[23]  D. Schluter,et al.  Adaptation from standing genetic variation. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier,et al.  Drosophila melanogaster recombination rate calculator. , 2010, Gene.

[25]  D. Fournier,et al.  Mutations of acetylcholinesterase which confer insecticide resistance in Drosophila melanogaster populations , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[26]  T. Nabeshima,et al.  An amino acid substitution attributable to insecticide-insensitivity of acetylcholinesterase in a Japanese encephalitis vector mosquito, Culex tritaeniorhynchus. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[27]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  The Evolution of Gene Regulation Underlies a Morphological Difference between Two Drosophila Sister Species , 2008, Cell.

[28]  D. Petrov,et al.  Pervasive Natural Selection in the Drosophila Genome? , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[29]  Peter Andolfatto,et al.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. , 2007, Genome research.

[30]  Michael Ashburner,et al.  Drosophila: A laboratory handbook , 1990 .

[31]  D. Petrov,et al.  Genomewide Spatial Correspondence Between Nonsynonymous Divergence and Neutral Polymorphism Reveals Extensive Adaptation in Drosophila , 2007, Genetics.

[32]  J. Hermisson,et al.  Soft Sweeps , 2005, Genetics.

[33]  C. Bottema,et al.  PCR amplification of specific alleles (PASA) is a general method for rapidly detecting known single-base changes. , 1992, BioTechniques.

[34]  Nigel F. Delaney,et al.  Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins , 2006, Science.

[35]  H. R. Smissaert Cholinesterase Inhibition in Spider Mites Susceptible and Resistant to Organophosphate , 1964, Science.

[36]  W. Stephan,et al.  Inferring the Demographic History and Rate of Adaptive Substitution in Drosophila , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[37]  Kevin R. Thornton,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Inference Reveals Evidence for a Recent, Severe Bottleneck in a Netherlands Population of Drosophila melanogaster , 2006, Genetics.

[38]  J. Hermisson,et al.  Soft sweeps II--molecular population genetics of adaptation from recurrent mutation or migration. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  Josefa González,et al.  High Rate of Recent Transposable Element–Induced Adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster , 2008, PLoS biology.

[40]  T. Lenormand,et al.  Independent duplications of the acetylcholinesterase gene conferring insecticide resistance in the mosquito Culex pipiens. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[41]  Yoshio Anazawa,et al.  Sequence of a cDNA encoding acetylcholinesterase from susceptible and resistant two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. , 2003, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[42]  Joachim Hermisson,et al.  Soft Sweeps III: The Signature of Positive Selection from Recurrent Mutation , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[43]  D. Begun,et al.  Linkage Disequilibrium and Recent Selection at Three Immunity Receptor Loci in Drosophila simulans Sequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under accession nos. AY864355, AY864606 and AY870440, AY870441, AY870442, AY870443, AY870444, AY870445, AY870446 , 2005, Genetics.

[44]  W. Ewens Mathematical Population Genetics , 1980 .

[45]  B. Charlesworth Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[46]  Marcus W Feldman,et al.  The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.

[47]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  Stochastic or deterministic: what is the effective population size of HIV-1? , 2006, Trends in microbiology.

[48]  Zhu,et al.  A Point Mutation of Acetylcholinesterase Associated with Azinphosmethyl Resistance and Reduced Fitness in Colorado Potato Beetle , 1996, Pesticide biochemistry and physiology.

[49]  J. M. Smith What use is sex? , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.