Clinical, angiographic, and genetic factors associated with early coronary stent thrombosis.

CONTEXT Despite dual antiplatelet therapy, stent thrombosis remains a devastating and unpredictable complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVE To perform a sequential analysis of clinical and genetic factors associated with definite early stent thrombosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Case-control study conducted in 10 centers in France between January 2007 and May 2010 among 123 patients undergoing PCI who had definite early stent thrombosis and DNA samples available, matched on age and sex with 246 stent thrombosis-free controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Accuracy of early stent thrombosis prediction by 23 genetic variants. RESULTS Among the 23 genetic variants investigated in 15 different genes, the significant determinants of early stent thrombosis were CYP2C19 metabolic status (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.47-2.69), ABCB1 3435 TT genotype (adjusted OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.21-3.88), and ITGB3 PLA2 carriage (adjusted OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.95). Nongenetic independent correlates were acuteness of PCI (adjusted OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.54-6.07), complex lesions (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type C) (adjusted OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.40-3.89), left ventricular function less than 40% (adjusted OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.09-4.70), diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.02-3.24), use of proton pump inhibitors (adjusted OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.29-3.75), and higher clopidogrel loading doses (adjusted OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.93). The discriminative accuracy of the clinical-only model was similar to that of a genetic-only model (area under the curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.67-0.78] vs 0.68 [95% CI, 0.62-0.74], respectively; P = .34). A combined clinical and genetic model led to a statistically significant increase in the discriminatory power of the model compared with the clinical-only model (area under the curve, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.83] vs 0.73 [95% CI, 0.67-0.78]; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS This case-control study identified 3 genes (CYP2C19, ABCB1, and ITGB3) and 2 clopidogrel-related factors (loading dose and proton pump inhibitors) that were independently associated with early stent thrombosis. Future studies are needed to validate the prognostic accuracy of these risk factors in prospective cohorts.

[1]  D. Mansuy,et al.  Paraoxonase-1 and clopidogrel efficacy , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[2]  P. Morange,et al.  Paraoxonase-1 and clopidogrel efficacy , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[3]  C. Hirschhäuser,et al.  Paraoxonase-1 is a major determinant of clopidogrel efficacy , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[4]  M. Fromm,et al.  Paraoxonase-1 Q192R Polymorphism and Antiplatelet Effects of Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Stent Placement , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics.

[5]  A. Kastrati,et al.  No association of paraoxonase-1 Q192R genotypes with platelet response to clopidogrel and risk of stent thrombosis after coronary stenting. , 2011, European heart journal.

[6]  J. Marchesini,et al.  Prospective evaluation of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity over time in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention relationship with gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  G. Stone,et al.  Frequency and Predictors of Stent Thrombosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2011, Circulation.

[8]  G. Montalescot,et al.  High doses of clopidogrel to overcome genetic resistance: the randomized crossover CLOVIS-2 (Clopidogrel and Response Variability Investigation Study 2). , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  G. Patrinos,et al.  Sequence variations in the FII, FV, F13A1, FGB and PAI-1 genes are associated with differences in myocardial perfusion. , 2011, Pharmacogenomics.

[10]  L. Bergougnan,et al.  Differential Effects of Omeprazole and Pantoprazole on the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Clopidogrel in Healthy Subjects: Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Crossover Comparison Studies , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[11]  S. Werns Dose Comparisons of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2011 .

[12]  J. Mega,et al.  Consortium ( CPIC ) guidelines for cytochrome P 450-2 C 19 ( CYP 2 C 19 ) genotype and clopidogrel therapy , 2011 .

[13]  P. Barragan,et al.  Clopidogrel loading dose adjustment according to platelet reactivity monitoring in patients carrying the 2C19*2 loss of function polymorphism. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  E. Antman,et al.  Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. , 2010, JAMA.

[15]  E. Antman,et al.  Genetic variants in ABCB1 and CYP2C19 and cardiovascular outcomes after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the TRITON–TIMI 38 trial: a pharmacogenetic analysis , 2010, The Lancet.

[16]  B. J. Barratt,et al.  Effect of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on outcomes of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: a genetic substudy of the PLATO trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[17]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (esc) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (eacts) Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I , 2022 .

[18]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dose comparisons of clopidogrel and aspirin in acute coronary syndromes. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Cardiovascular risk in clopidogrel-treated patients according to cytochrome P450 2C19*2 loss-of-function allele or proton pump inhibitor coadministration: a systematic meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Cytochrome 2C19*17 Allelic Variant, Platelet Aggregation, Bleeding Events, and Stent Thrombosis in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients With Coronary Stent Placement , 2010, Circulation.

[23]  D. Tàssies,et al.  Polymorphisms in platelet glycoproteins Ia and IIIa are associated with arterial thrombosis and carotid atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes , 2010, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[24]  Osamu Okazaki,et al.  Identification of the Human Cytochrome P450 Enzymes Involved in the Two Oxidative Steps in the Bioactivation of Clopidogrel to Its Pharmacologically Active Metabolite , 2010, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[25]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Pharmacogenetics in cardiovascular antithrombotic therapy. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  J. O’Connell,et al.  Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. , 2009, JAMA.

[28]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Can we override clopidogrel resistance? , 2009, Circulation.

[29]  F. Verheugt,et al.  Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: the Dutch Stent Thrombosis Registry. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism and clopidogrel after MI – Authors' reply , 2009, The Lancet.

[31]  R. Rakhit,et al.  Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism and clopidogrel after MI , 2009, The Lancet.

[32]  E. Antman,et al.  Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  A. V. Van't Hof,et al.  Long-Term Clinical Outcome After a First Angiographically Confirmed Coronary Stent Thrombosis: An Analysis of 431 Cases , 2009, Circulation.

[34]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Dose Effect of Clopidogrel Reloading in Patients Already on 75-mg Maintenance Dose: The Reload With Clopidogrel Before Coronary Angioplasty in Subjects Treated Long Term With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (RELOAD) Study , 2008, Circulation.

[35]  J. Tardif,et al.  Clopidogrel 600-mg double loading dose achieves stronger platelet inhibition than conventional regimens: results from the PREPAIR randomized study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg,et al.  Influence of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms on drug therapies: pharmacogenetic, pharmacoepigenetic and clinical aspects. , 2007, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[37]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.

[38]  Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S8 Table S1 Movies S1 to S3 a " Silent " Polymorphism in the Mdr1 Gene Changes Substrate Specificity Corrected 30 November 2007; See Last Page , 2022 .

[39]  N. Kleiman,et al.  Genetic polymorphisms of the platelet receptors P2Y(12), P2Y(1) and GP IIIa and response to aspirin and clopidogrel. , 2007, Thrombosis research.

[40]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Impact of P‐glycoprotein on clopidogrel absorption , 2006, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[41]  Yibo Wang,et al.  VKORC1 Haplotypes Are Associated With Arterial Vascular Diseases (Stroke, Coronary Heart Disease, and Aortic Dissection) , 2006, Circulation.

[42]  P. Binkley,et al.  Effect of platelet antigen polymorphism on platelet inhibition by aspirin, clopidogrel, or their combination. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[43]  E. Trabetti,et al.  PlA polymorphism and platelet reactivity following clopidogrel loading dose in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation , 2004, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[44]  Petra Verhoef,et al.  MTHFR 677C-->T polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. , 2002, JAMA.

[45]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.