Development of a Single-Moment Cloud Microphysics Scheme with Prognostic Hail for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model

This study examines the effect of hail on microphysical processes and precipitation. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Single-Moment 7-class Microphysics (WSM7) is developed by introducing the hail hydrometeor as an additional prognostic water substance within the WSM6 scheme, which are four-ice and three-ice schemes, respectively. In an idealized 2D squall case, the WSM7 scheme with hail tends to enhance the accretion rate of ice particles due to the faster sedimentation of hail than that of graupel in the WSM6 scheme. The amount of hail is largely compensated with the reduction of graupel, but its maximum at lower altitudes. Weakened accretion of graupel by snow at higher altitudes maintains the snow aloft, and increases of it at the mid-level. The reduced sum of graupel and hail at the melting level leads to a decrease in the mixing ratio of rain in the WSM7 experiment, which is compensated by falling hail. In 3D squall line experiments, the WSM7 scheme tends to enhance convective activities in the leading edge of the squall line, whereas the precipitation intensity in the trailing stratiform region decreases. This is due to the fact that the addition of hail plays a role in suppressing light precipitation and increasing heavy precipitation activities.

[1]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  Quantitative precipitation forecast experiments of heavy rainfall over Jeju Island on 14-16 September 2007 using the WRF model , 2009 .

[2]  H. D. Orville,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud Model , 1983 .

[3]  J. Curry,et al.  A New Double-Moment Microphysics Parameterization for Application in Cloud and Climate Models. Part I: Description , 2005 .

[4]  C. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of cloud microphysics schemes in simulations of a winter storm using radar and radiometer measurements , 2013 .

[5]  A. Clark,et al.  Evaluation of and Suggested Improvements to the WSM6 Microphysics in WRF- ARW Using Synthetic and Observed GOES-13 Imagery , 2014 .

[6]  Di Wu,et al.  Benefits of a 4th Ice Class in the Simulated Radar Reflectivities of Convective Systems Using a Bulk Microphysics Scheme , 2014 .

[7]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  Evaluation of the WRF Double-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme for Precipitating Convection , 2010 .

[8]  B. Colle,et al.  Bulk Microphysical Sensitivities within the MM5 for Orographic Precipitation. Part I: The Sierra 1986 Event , 2004 .

[9]  Peter V. Hobbs,et al.  Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles , 1974 .

[10]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme (WSM6) , 2006 .

[11]  Di Wu,et al.  High‐resolution NU‐WRF simulations of a deep convective‐precipitation system during MC3E: Further improvements and comparisons between Goddard microphysics schemes and observations , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[12]  Yanluan Lin,et al.  The 4–5 December 2001 IMPROVE-2 Event: Observed Microphysics and Comparisons with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model , 2009 .

[13]  Peter V. Hobbs,et al.  The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. XII: A Diagnostic Modeling Study of Precipitation Development in Narrow Cold-Frontal Rainbands , 1984 .

[14]  Z. Pu,et al.  Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations , 2008 .

[15]  Song-You Hong,et al.  Development of an Effective Double-Moment Cloud Microphysics Scheme with Prognostic Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) for Weather and Climate Models , 2010 .

[16]  N. V. van Lipzig,et al.  The role of precipitation size distributions in km‐scale NWP simulations of intense precipitation: evaluation of cloud properties and surface precipitation , 2012 .

[17]  S. Rutledge,et al.  The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. VIII: A Model for the “Seeder-Feeder” Process in Warm-Frontal Rainbands , 1983 .

[18]  G. Mellor,et al.  Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems , 1982 .

[19]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[20]  G. Thompson,et al.  Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization , 2008 .

[21]  H. Morrison,et al.  Prediction of Graupel Density in a Bulk Microphysics Scheme , 2013 .

[22]  Bowen Zhou,et al.  Explicit prediction of hail using multimoment microphysics schemes for a hailstorm of 19 March 2014 in eastern China , 2017 .

[23]  G. Thompson,et al.  Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes , 2009 .

[24]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  Effects of bulk ice microphysics on the simulated monsoonal precipitation over east Asia , 2005 .

[25]  G. Grell,et al.  A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques , 2002 .

[26]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  A New Method for Representing Mixed-phase Particle Fall Speeds in Bulk Microphysics Parameterizations , 2008 .

[27]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A Revised Approach to Ice Microphysical Processes for the Bulk Parameterization of Clouds and Precipitation , 2004 .

[28]  W. Tao,et al.  Impacts of microphysical scheme on convective and stratiform characteristics in two high precipitation squall line events , 2013 .

[29]  Xin-Zhong Liang,et al.  A Thermal Infrared Radiation Parameterization for Atmospheric Studies , 2001 .