On Power System Controlled Separation

This paper describes verification of five conjectures related to power system controlled separation. It attempts to verify that the location of uncontrolled separation (loss of synchronism or out-of-step operation) is independent of the location and severity (short-circuit duty or duration) of the initial faults, that the location depends on the prevailing network configuration and load level, and that it takes place one operation at a time (cascades). Verification of these conjectures would allow controlled separation during a disturbance in real-time, using the present communication and protection systems, and results in a minimal load and generation imbalance. Two actual power systems were used, a 50-bus system to establish the procedure for controlled separation and a 640-bus interconnection to apply the procedure. Data representing static and dynamic behavior of the two power systems were obtained from the operating utilities, and the many required simulations were conducted using EPRI Power System Analysis Package (including IPFLOW and ETMSP programs)

[1]  Ning Zhu,et al.  An AGC implementation for system islanding and restoration conditions , 1994 .

[2]  Albert Chang,et al.  Power System Dynamic Equivalents , 1970 .

[3]  V. Vittal,et al.  Self-Healing in Power Systems: An Approach Using Islanding and Rate of Frequency Decline Based Load Shedding , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[4]  V. Vittal,et al.  Slow coherency-based islanding , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  B. Bowler,et al.  An Analysis of Interarea Dynamics of Multi-Machine Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[6]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Determination of generator groupings for an islanding scheme in the Manitoba Hydro system using the method of normal forms , 1998 .

[7]  M. M. Adibi,et al.  Protective system issues during restoration , 1995 .

[8]  H. Ahmad,et al.  A Scheme for Controlled Islanding to Prevent Subsequent Blackout , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[9]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Self-healing in power systems: an approach using islanding and rate of frequency decline-based load shedding , 2002 .

[10]  M. M. Adibi An AGC Implementation for System Islanding and Restoration Conditions , 2000 .

[11]  Chan-Nan Lu,et al.  DEFENSE PLAN DESIGN IN A LONGITUDINAL POWER SYSTEM , 2002 .

[12]  J. Deuse,et al.  Major incidents on the French electric system: potentiality and curative measures studies , 1993 .

[13]  Kai Sun,et al.  Splitting strategies for islanding operation of large-scale power systems using OBDD-based methods , 2003 .

[14]  M. M. Adibi,et al.  Local band shedding , 1988 .

[15]  M. M. Adibi,et al.  Frequency response of prime movers during restoration , 1999 .

[16]  J. A. Jordan,et al.  Solution methods for transient and dynamic stability , 1974 .

[17]  R. Cresap,et al.  Northwest Power Pool Transient Stability and Load Shedding Controls for Generation-Load Imbalances , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[18]  Robin Podmore,et al.  Identification of Coherent Generators for Dynamic Equivalents , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[19]  J. M. Haner,et al.  Experience with the R-RDOT out-of-Step Relay , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[20]  Kai Sun,et al.  A study of system splitting strategies for island operation of power system: a two-phase method based on OBDDs , 2003 .