Systems for supporting communication in organizations should be founded on a theory of language and communication. A well-known theory for this purpose is speech act theory, developed by Austin and Searle. Flores e.a. used this theory for the design of THE COORDINATOR. Speech act theory however has some serious shortcomings which are brought to the fore by Habermas. His examination of Searle's theory leads to the development of an alternative theory: the theory of communicative action.
In this paper both theories are described to the extent considered necessary to discuss the shortcomings of the speech act theory and to show the superiority of the theory of communicative action. In addition the consequences of the latter for the design of communication supporting systems are revealed by a critical discussion of the fundamental assumptions and the practical design of THE COORDINATOR.
[1]
R. Keat.
The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas
,
1980
.
[2]
J. Searle,et al.
Expression and Meaning.
,
1982
.
[3]
D. Holdcroft.
Expression and Meaning.
,
1982
.
[4]
Brad Hartfield,et al.
Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction
,
1988,
TOIS.
[5]
Kalle Lyytinen,et al.
Action based model of information system
,
1986,
Inf. Syst..
[6]
Kalle Lyytinen,et al.
A speech-act-based office modeling approach
,
1988,
TOIS.
[7]
Terry Winograd,et al.
Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design
,
1987
.
[8]
Johannes Berger,et al.
Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns
,
1983,
Telos.