Optimization of power system operation with static var compensator applying ACO algorithm

Loss minimization, cost minimization and voltage stability are the major concerns for modern power system networks operating under highly stressed conditions due to continuously increased power demand. So, it is necessary to analyze the power system considering these factors. A Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) device such as Static Var Compensator (SVC) in a power system improves the voltage stability, reduces the power loss and also improves the load ability of the system. This study investigates the application of Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) technique to find optimal location and rated value of SVC thus optimizing total power loss, generation cost, FACTS device cost and improving voltage profile in the power system. Simulations are performed on IEEE 14 bus and IEEE 57 bus. It is observed from the results that total loss is optimized, total cost is minimized and voltage profile is improved.

[1]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms , 1992 .

[2]  Mehmet Tumay,et al.  Mathematical modeling and analysis of a unified power flow controller: A comparison of two approaches in power flow studies and effects of UPFC location , 2007 .

[3]  Narayana Prasad Padhy,et al.  Optimal location and controller design of STATCOM for power system stability improvement using PSO , 2008, J. Frankl. Inst..

[4]  K.Y. Lee,et al.  Static Voltage Stability Margin Enhancement Using STATCOM, TCSC and SSSC , 2005, 2005 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference & Exposition: Asia and Pacific.

[5]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Distributed Optimization by Ant Colonies , 1992 .

[6]  S. Bhowmick,et al.  An Indirect UPFC Model to Enhance Reusability of Newton Power-Flow Codes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[7]  Azah Mohamed,et al.  Optimal placement and sizing of Static Var Compensators in power systems using Improved Harmony Search Algorithm , 2011 .

[8]  T. Malakar,et al.  Optimal location and size determination of FACTS devices by using multiobjective optimal power flow , 2010, TENCON 2010 - 2010 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[9]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  Power flow control and power flow studies for systems with FACTS devices , 1998 .

[10]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Selection of optimal number and location of thyristor-controlled phase shifters using genetic based algorithms , 2004 .

[11]  M. Tavakoli Bina,et al.  Simultaneous application of multi-type FACTS devices to the restructured environment: achieving both optimal number and location , 2010 .

[12]  Mehrdad Ghandhari,et al.  Use of UPFC for optimal power flow control , 1997 .

[13]  S. Gerbex,et al.  Optimal Location of Multi-Type FACTS Devices in a Power System by Means of Genetic Algorithms , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[14]  Mehrdad Ghandhari,et al.  Improving power system dynamics by series-connected FACTS devices , 1997 .

[15]  K. R. Niazi,et al.  Optimal location of FACTS devices for improving performance of the power systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[16]  Enrique Acha,et al.  A thyristor controlled series compensator model for the power flow solution of practical power networks , 2000 .

[17]  Narain G. Hingorani,et al.  Power electronics in electric utilities: role of power electronics in future power systems , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[18]  Enrique Acha,et al.  FACTS: Modelling and Simulation in Power Networks , 2004 .

[19]  Ali Abur,et al.  Static security enhancement via optimal utilization of thyristor-controlled series capacitors , 2002 .

[20]  Rafael Mihalic,et al.  Transient stability assessment of systems comprising phase-shifting FACTS devices by direct methods , 2004 .