Small‐Molecule Screening and Profiling by Using Automated Microscopy

Automated fluorescence microscopy provides a powerful tool for analyzing the physiological state of single cells with high throughput and high information content. Here I discuss two types of experiments in which this technology was used to discover and characterize bioactive small molecules. In phenotypic‐screening experiments, the goal is to find “hits” with specific effects on cells by screening large libraries of small molecules. An example is screening for small molecules that perturb mitosis by novel mechanisms. In cytological‐profiling experiments, the goal is to characterize the bioactivity of a limited number of small molecules in considerable depth, and thus understand their mechanism and toxicities at the cellular level. I discuss an example in which 100 small molecules with known bioactivity were profiled by using multiple fluorescent probes, and clustered into mechanistic classes by automated statistical analysis.

[1]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  Chemical genomic profiling of biological networks using graph theory and combinations of small molecule perturbations. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Ashutosh P Jadhav,et al.  Exo1: A new chemical inhibitor of the exocytic pathway , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  S. Haggarty,et al.  Small molecule inhibitor of mitotic spindle bipolarity identified in a phenotype-based screen. , 1999, Science.

[4]  K. Giuliano,et al.  Synthesis and high content cell-based profiling of simplified analogues of the microtubule stabilizer (+)-discodermolide. , 2002, Molecular cancer therapeutics.

[5]  B. DeDecker,et al.  Chemical genetics to identify NFAT inhibitors: Potential of targeting calcium mobilization in immunosuppression , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  T. Mitchison,et al.  A high-throughput cell migration assay using scratch wound healing, a comparison of image-based readout methods , 2004, BMC biotechnology.

[7]  A. Parissenti,et al.  The use of DNA microarrays to investigate the pharmacogenomics of drug response in living systems. , 2004, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Timothy J Mitchison,et al.  High‐Content Screening and Profiling of Drug Activity in an Automated Centrosome‐Duplication Assay , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[9]  R A Blake,et al.  Cellular screening assays using fluorescence microscopy. , 2001, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[10]  D. L. Taylor,et al.  High content screening applied to large-scale cell biology. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Phenotypic screening of small molecule libraries by high throughput cell imaging. , 2003, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[12]  T. Kapoor,et al.  HR22C16: a potent small-molecule probe for the dynamics of cell division. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  Parallel Chemical Genetic and Genome-Wide RNAi Screens Identify Cytokinesis Inhibitors and Targets , 2004, PLoS biology.

[14]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  A chemical genetic screen identifies inhibitors of regulated nuclear export of a Forkhead transcription factor in PTEN-deficient tumor cells. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[15]  B. Stockwell Chemical genetics: ligand-based discovery of gene function , 2000, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  G. S. Johnson,et al.  An Information-Intensive Approach to the Molecular Pharmacology of Cancer , 1997, Science.

[17]  F. Gasparri,et al.  Quantification of the Proliferation Index of Human Dermal Fibroblast Cultures with the ArrayScan™ High-Content Screening Reader , 2004, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[18]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Multidimensional Drug Profiling By Automated Microscopy , 2004, Science.