Regulating P2p Lending In Indonesia: Lessons Learned from the Case of China and India

P2P lending industry in Indonesia has undergone a significant growth in the past two years. The growth of the sector has been perceived positively by public and the government. With the very first P2P lending regulation has just being released in late 2016, the sector is still in its early phase. Yet, there are possible necessities to institutionalize P2P lending service platform, as possible various service and business model of P2P lending and fintech in general may come in hindsight. This research is intended to see possible lessons learnt on regulating P2P lending sector, based on the case of China and India. The feasibility on implementing such lessons is then being discussed through Actor and Network Analysis approach. The result shows that among the three countries compared, Indonesia which adapted a functional regulatory supervision approach is seen as having more stabilized and best adapted financial services regulatory system compared to China and India. Lessons learned therefore are to focus their current regulatory directions and goals set out by central regulators. The result of Actor and Network Analysis suggested that in order to continue such regulatory goal, collaborations and growth theme should be fostered in the ongoing regulatory framework in order to accommodate the interest of borrowers, P2P Lending Owner, and collaborative partners.

[1]  Christian Haddad,et al.  The emergence of the global fintech market: economic and technological determinants , 2018, Small Business Economics.

[2]  Gerhard Schwabe,et al.  The FinTech phenomenon: antecedents of financial innovation perceived by the popular press , 2016 .

[3]  Adrian Fong,et al.  Regulation of peer-to-peer lending in Hong Kong: state of play , 2015 .

[4]  Jui-Long Hung,et al.  FinTech in Taiwan: a case study of a Bank’s strategic planning for an investment in a FinTech company , 2016 .

[5]  L. Hermans,et al.  Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems , 2010 .

[6]  Benjamin Wiegner Financial Management for Innovation Fintech-Start-Ups vs. Usual Companies , 2016 .

[7]  Nathan,et al.  The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[8]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer,et al.  Screening in New Credit Markets: Can Individual Lenders Infer Borrower Creditworthiness in Peer-to-Peer Lending? , 2009 .

[9]  I. Galloway Peer-to-peer lending and community development finance , 2009 .

[10]  Siva Viswanathan,et al.  Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Sergio Herrero-Lopez,et al.  Social interactions in P2P lending , 2009, SNA-KDD '09.

[12]  Lance A. Young,et al.  Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending , 2012 .

[13]  B. Funk,et al.  Online Peer-to-Peer Lending - A Literature Review , 2011 .