Assessment of renal artery stenosis with CT angiography: usefulness of multiplanar reformation, quantitative stenosis measurements, and densitometric analysis of renal parenchymal enhancement as adjuncts to MIP film reading.

PURPOSE Our goal was to evaluate CT angiography (CTA) in diagnosing renal artery stenosis (RAS). METHOD Thirty-seven patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CTA. Visual interpretation and stenosis measurements were made from maximum intensity projection (MIP) and multiplanar reformation (MPR) laser film prints of 78 renal arteries. RESULTS Visual reading of MIP films showed good diagnostic performance by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with 100% sensitivity in the assessment of > or = 50% RAS but only 42-54% specificity (overall accuracy 60-75%). The false-positive rate decreased when MIP and MPR films were read together, but the excess of false negatives among the calcified lesions disabled this diagnostic algorithm. Combining visual interpretation of MIP films with quantitative measurements yielded the best diagnostic performance: 92% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and 84% overall accuracy. Renal cortical enhancement measurements (26 patients) had 81% overall accuracy. CONCLUSION The overall accuracy of CTA with MIP film reading can be enhanced by quantitative measurement of stenosis or reviewing MPRs.

[1]  G. Murray,et al.  Secondary hypertension in a blood pressure clinic. , 1987, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  L. Svetkey,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Strategies for Diagnosing Renovascular Hypertension , 1989, Hypertension.

[3]  M. Prokop,et al.  Minimally invasive diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by spiral computed tomography angiography. , 1995, Kidney international.

[4]  G. Rubin,et al.  Helical (spiral) CT of the retroperitoneum. , 1995, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[5]  M Galanski,et al.  Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography. , 1993, Radiology.

[6]  M. Blaufox,et al.  Apparent prevalence of curable hypertension in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. , 1985, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[8]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Determination of Scan Delay Time in Spiral CT‐Angiography: Utility of a Test Bolus Injection , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  W. Mali,et al.  Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: ostial or truncal? , 1996, Radiology.

[10]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[11]  G Wang,et al.  Technical optimization of spiral CT for depiction of renal artery stenosis: in vitro analysis. , 1995, Radiology.

[12]  J. Beregi,et al.  Helical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  L. Wilhelmsen,et al.  Prevalence of primary and secondary hypertension: studies in a random population sample. , 1976, British medical journal.

[14]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.