The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect

Models of the numerical cognitive system differ in the importance they attach to magnitude information in numerical processing. In this paper, the necessity of addressing a central semantic magnitude system in arabic number processing is evaluated by looking at the SNARC-effect (Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993). The existence of a Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes (small numbers are reacted to faster with the left hand, large numbers with the right hand) has been interpreted as an indication of access to the semantic system. In Experiment 1, we replicated the effect in a parity judgement task. In Experiment 2, we extended the SNARC-effect to a phoneme monitoring task, showing that magnitude information was accessed during arabic-to-verbal transcoding. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the SNARC effect in the phoneme monitoring task did not change with practice. We conclude, therefore, that number magnitude plays a more important role than is generally accepted.

[1]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Architectures for numerical cognition , 1994, Cognition.

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[3]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Arabic Number Reading Deficit - a Single-case Study Or When 236 Is Read (2306) and Judged Superior To 1258 , 1993 .

[4]  M. McCloskey Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia , 1992, Cognition.

[5]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[6]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[7]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  An encoding-complex view of cognitive number processing: Comment on McCloskey, Sokol, and Goodman (1986). , 1988 .

[8]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Cognitive processes in verbal-number production: inferences from the performance of brain-damaged subjects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[11]  S Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.