Hidden Health Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

The adoption of readily available measures to lower GHG emissions in Santiago, Mexico City, SA£o Paulo, and New York over the next two decades would also provide major public health benefits from associated reductions in particulate matter and ozone ambient concentrations. Improved technologies to reduce fossil-fuel combustion could reduce these copollutants by about 10%, and thereby avoid some 64,000 premature deaths (including infant deaths), 65,000 chronic bronchitis cases, and 37 million person-days of restricted activity or work loss in these four cities alone through 2020. If the substantial public health benefits we have charted here become more widely recognized, and their full economic and social impact are integrated into discussions of climate policy, this could prompt a major rethinking of the climate debate and help break through the present impasse.

[1]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[2]  G. Thurston,et al.  Assessing the health benefits of urban air pollution reductions associated with climate change mitigation (2000-2020): Santiago, São Paulo, México City, and New York City. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  A. Correa,et al.  Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth weight in the Northeastern United States. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  J M Samet,et al.  The potential impacts of climate variability and change on air pollution-related health effects in the United States. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  R. Yancik,et al.  Impact of changes in transportation and commuting behaviors during the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta on air quality and childhood asthma. , 2001, JAMA.

[6]  F. Dominici,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  N Künzli,et al.  Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and the American Cancer Society Study of Particulate Air , 2000 .

[9]  B. Brunekreef.  The effect of air pollution on infant mortality appears specific for respiratory causes in the postneonatal period. , 1999 .

[10]  D. Loomis,et al.  Air pollution and infant mortality in Mexico City. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[11]  P. Hartge.  Raising response rates: getting to yes. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[12]  D. Davis.  Short-term improvements in public health from global-climate policies on fossil-fuel combustion: an interim report , 1997, The Lancet.

[13]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. , 1996 .

[14]  U. Epa.  Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter , 1996 .