Thinking Inside the Box: Self-Efficacy of Women in Engineering*

We describe an initiative to investigate how institutional practices implementing information technology can promote retention of women in engineering through enhancing their self-perceptions and motivations. The initiative uses the self-efficacy theory to implement teaching techniques designed to promote educational attributes: greater motivation, effort, and persistence. The particular method we chose was to design and teach a course to educate women in the area of computer problem diagnosis and repair. Continued demonstration and reinforcement of the proficiency attained by the women throughout the course in computer technology distinguished them among colleagues and established an environment conducive to enhancing students’ feelings of self-efficacy and associated control beliefs.

[1]  R. Felder,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes , 1995 .

[2]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[3]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[4]  E. Lenney.  What's fine for the gander isn't always good for the goose: Sex differences in self-confidence as a function of ability area and comparison with others , 1981 .

[5]  S. Widnall,et al.  AAAS Presidential Lecture: Voices from the Pipeline , 1988, Science.

[6]  A M Saks.  LONGITUDINAL FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE MODERATING AND MEDIATING AND NEWCOMER ADJUSTMENT , 1995 .

[7]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[8]  Jonathan A. Plucker,et al.  Secondary science and mathematics teachers and gender equity: Attitudes and attempted interventions , 1996 .

[9]  D. Schunk,et al.  Peer Models : Influence on Children's Self-Efficacy and Achievement , 1985 .

[10]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[11]  D. Tapscott.  Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation , 1984 .

[12]  D Wolfle,et al.  Women in Science and Engineering. , 1964, Science.

[13]  Suzanne G. Brainard,et al.  A Six‐Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science * , 1998 .

[14]  G. Hackett,et al.  Self-efficacy in Changing Societies: Self-efficacy in career choice and development , 1995 .

[15]  A. Bandura.  Reflections on self-efficacy , 1978 .

[16]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[17]  Stephen G. Brush,et al.  Women in Science and Engineering , 1991 .

[18]  Walter G. Daniel,et al.  Toward Black Undergraduate Student Equality in American Higher Education. , 1988 .

[19]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[20]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. , 1991 .

[21]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Career Choice and Development , 1995 .

[22]  J. P. Byrnes,et al.  Retention and Performance of Male and Female Engineering Students: An Examination of Academic and Environmental Variables , 1998 .

[23]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[24]  Michael T. Nettles,et al.  Toward Black Undergraduate Student Equality in American Higher Education , 1988 .

[25]  A. Bandura,et al.  Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. , 1981 .