Natural emergence

Emergence is analyzed by the principle of least action. The supreme law of nature describes diverse systems as actions that evolve from one state to another by consuming free energy in least time. As the system will either gain or lose quanta at the step of evolution, the systemic characteristics after the change of state cannot be reduced to those before the change. The change will invariably entail also a change in inter-actions, which are flows of energy on paths that integrate ingredient systems to a synergistic system. New qualities will emerge along with opening interactions just as old ones will disappear along with ceasing interactions. The analysis of emergence as a natural process reveals that its irreducible and unpredictable nature does not result from complexity as such but because the natural process itself is molding the surroundings where it is evolving. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity, 2012 © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  R. Penrose,et al.  A theory of everything? , 2005, Nature.

[2]  Vivek Sharma,et al.  Natural process--natural selection. , 2007, Biophysical chemistry.

[3]  Ville R. I. Kaila,et al.  Natural selection for least action , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Teemu Mäkelä,et al.  Natural patterns of energy dispersal. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[5]  Robert M. May,et al.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[6]  Peter A. Corning,et al.  The re-emergence of "emergence": A venerable concept in search of a theory , 2002, Complex..

[7]  N. Pierce.  Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[8]  P. Verhulst.  Recherches mathématiques sur la loi d’accroissement de la population , 1845, Nouveaux mémoires de l'Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres de Bruxelles.

[9]  Bak,et al.  Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[10]  Arto Annila,et al.  Ecological succession as an energy dispersal process , 2010, Biosyst..

[11]  P. Anderson.  More is different. , 1972, Science.

[12]  G. Leibniz,et al.  Discourse on metaphysics, and The monadology , 1992 .

[13]  D. Chalmers.  Strong and Weak Emergence , 2006 .

[14]  Margaret Morrison.  Emergence, Reduction, and Theoretical Principles: Rethinking Fundamentalism , 2006, Philosophy of Science.

[15]  P. Waage,et al.  Studies concerning affinity , 1986 .

[16]  Tuomas K. Pernu,et al.  In the light of time , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  William Thomson.  XXV. On the dynamical theory of heat, with numerical results deduced from Mr. Joule's equivalent of a thermal unit, and M. Regnault's observations on steam , 1852 .

[18]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The middle way. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Arto Annila.  All in Action , 2010, Entropy.

[20]  William Thomson.  3. On the Dynamical Theory of Heat, with Numerical Results deduced from Mr Joule's Equivalent of a Thermal Unit, and M. Regnault's Observations on Steam , 1857 .

[21]  Arto Annila,et al.  Why did life emerge? , 2008, International Journal of Astrobiology.

[22]  Robert B. Laughlin,et al.  Nobel Lecture: Fractional quantization , 1999 .

[23]  A. Annila.  Least-time paths of light , 2011 .

[24]  Arto Annila,et al.  Physical foundations of evolutionary theory , 2010 .

[25]  William Thomson,et al.  XV.— On the Dynamical Theory of Heat, with numerical results deduced from Mr Joule's Equivalent of a Thermal Unit, and M. Regnault's Observations on Steam , 1853 .