Chinese academic experts' assessment for forest bio-energy development in China

The aim of this study was to assess the current situation of the forest bio-energy development in China. This assessment is based on opinions of Chinese academic experts. Key drivers and uncertainties regarding the implementation, and the strategies for the future practices in the development of forest bio-energy were investigated. In addition, the purpose of this study was also to determine whether there is a consensus among the experts concerning forest bio-energy and if this consensus agrees with policy-makers in China. A thorough assessment was conducted using a two-round Delphi survey of sixty-one bio-energy experts in China. The results revealed the advantages, potential problems, and the experts' recommendations for the future development. Furthermore, the experts agreed that the Chinese government plays a dominant role in the development process of forest bio-energy in the country. The experts recognized that the process of developing forest bio-energy is a challenging task both domestically and globally. At the same time they also highlighted the potential benefits of developing forest bio-energy in China during the next ten years. The outcomes of this study could be used to give advice to policy-makers and to support the implementation of the future forest bio-energy policies in China.

[1]  R. J. Raison.  Opportunities and impediments to the expansion of forest bioenergy in Australia , 2006 .

[2]  Richard M. Cruse,et al.  Sustainable Biofuels Redux , 2008, Science.

[3]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  Stakeholders’ perceptions on forest biomass-based bioenergy development in the southern US , 2009 .

[4]  U. Beck.  WORLD AT RISK , 2008 .

[5]  D. Schröter,et al.  Stakeholder dialogue as a communication and negotiation tool in scientific inquiry , 2009 .

[6]  Lin Gan,et al.  Bioenergy transition in rural China: Policy options and co-benefits , 2008 .

[7]  William C. Clark,et al.  From Science to Policy: Assessing the Assessment Process , 2001 .

[8]  M. Keyzer,et al.  Policy Options for China's Bio-Ethanol Development and the Implications for its Agricultural Economy , 2008 .

[9]  Zhang PeiDong,et al.  Bioenergy industries development in China: Dilemma and solution , 2009 .

[10]  Expert judgment for nuclear energy , 2000 .

[11]  Anabela Carvalho,et al.  Communicating climate change : discourses, mediations and perceptions , 2008 .

[12]  R. Sawyer.  Science based policy for addressing energy and environmental problems , 2009 .

[13]  Paavo Pelkonen,et al.  Bio-energy in China: Content analysis of news articles on Chinese professional internet platforms , 2009 .

[14]  K. Czaplicka-Kolarz,et al.  Technology foresight for a vision of energy sector development in Poland till 2030. Delphi survey as an element of technology foresighting , 2009 .

[15]  Jikun Huang,et al.  China's Agricultural Research System and Reforms: Challenges and Implications for Developing Countries , 2004, Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development.

[16]  Paul Upham,et al.  Local public opinion of a proposed 21.5 MW(e) biomass gasifier in Devon: questionnaire survey results. , 2007 .

[17]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Social barriers in wind power implementation in The Netherlands: Perceptions of wind power entrepreneurs and local civil servants of institutional and social conditions in realizing wind power projects , 2007 .

[18]  S. Fan,et al.  Agricultural Research and Urban Poverty: The Case of China , 2003 .

[19]  Clair Gough.  State of the Art in Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in the UK: an experts' review , 2008 .

[20]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[21]  Pentti Hakkila,et al.  Factors driving the development of forest energy in Finland. , 2006 .

[22]  Qiang Wang,et al.  China's Energy Policy Comes at a Price , 2008, Science.

[23]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy expansion in the EU: Cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels , 2007 .

[24]  R. Balasubramanian,et al.  Analytical search of problems and prospects of power sector through Delphi study: case study of Kerala State, India , 2003 .

[25]  Matthew David,et al.  Social Research: The Basics , 2004 .

[26]  Chuangzhi Wu,et al.  The development of bioenergy technology in China. , 2010 .

[27]  M. Juntti,et al.  Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment , 2009 .

[28]  S. Démurger,et al.  Forest Management Policies and Resource Balance in China , 2009 .

[29]  Jingyi Han,et al.  Small-scale bioenergy projects in rural China: Lessons to be learnt , 2008 .

[30]  R. Clark,et al.  Roles of research scientists in natural resource decision-making , 2001 .

[31]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy - possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. , 2007 .

[32]  Michael Pregernig,et al.  Putting science into practice: the diffusion of scientific knowledge exemplified by the Austrian `Research Initiative Against Forest Decline' , 2000 .

[33]  Wenliang Wu,et al.  Study on sustainable development of rural household energy in northern China , 2008 .