Introduction: User Experience in and for Learning

This chapter serves as the introduction to the edited volume ‘Designing for the User Experience in Learning Systems’. It sets out to frame design for learning, including the description of some design principles for learning systems, and then proceeds to set the goals of the volume, indicate some prior work in this area, and summarise the contributions of the chapters in terms of addressing the goals.

[1]  J. Seale.  E-Learning and Disability in Higher Education: Accessibility Research and Practice , 2006 .

[2]  F. Guay,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics in Elementary School: A Longitudinal Investigation of Their Association. , 2016, Child development.

[3]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research , 2014 .

[4]  J. Voogt,et al.  A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies , 2012 .

[5]  Kevin Burden,et al.  Viewing Mobile Learning from a Pedagogical Perspective , 2012 .

[6]  J. Traxler.  Distance education and mobile learning: Catching up, taking stock , 2010 .

[7]  Ioannis Kazanidis,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of three-dimensional multi-user virtual worlds for STEM education: A mixed-method systematic literature review , 2016, Education and Information Technologies.

[8]  Christian M. Stracke,et al.  The Quality of MOOCs: How to Improve the Design of Open Education and Online Courses for Learners? , 2017, HCI.

[9]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Digital game-based learning , 2000, CIE.

[10]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity, and Instructional Role , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[11]  Namje Park,et al.  The Effect of STEAM Education on Elementary School Student's Creativity Improvement , 2012 .

[12]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Embedding critics in design environments , 1993, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[13]  D. Maor,et al.  Inquiry, Engagement, and Literacy in Science: A Retrospective, Cross-National Analysis Using PISA 2006 , 2014 .

[14]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Child computer interaction , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Sergio Luján-Mora,et al.  Technological Innovations in Large-Scale Teaching , 2018 .

[16]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[17]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  THE GENDER SYSTEM AND INTERACTION , 1999 .

[18]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Web 2.0 in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: a research synthesis and implications for instructional design and educational practice , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[19]  David Duran,et al.  Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism , 2017 .

[20]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[21]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills : methods and approach , 2015 .

[22]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  Cost-justifying usability , 2005 .

[23]  Vincent P. Wade,et al.  Adaptive Educational Games: Providing Non-invasive Personalised Learning Experiences , 2008, 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning.

[24]  Randolph G. Bias.  22 Chapter – Cost-Justifying Usability: The View from the Other Side of the Table , 2005 .

[25]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age , 2005 .

[26]  David Zyngier,et al.  (Re)conceptualising Student Engagement: Doing Education Not Doing Time. , 2008 .

[27]  Cassie Quigley,et al.  Developing a Conceptual Model of STEAM Teaching Practices , 2017 .

[28]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..