Combining plant and animal traits to assess community functional responses to disturbance

There is a general consensus that functional traits are reliable indicators of adaptation of organisms to particular environmental characteristics. In this study we relate the combined distributions of species traits of plants and animals to disturbance regimes in chestnut forests of southern Switzerland affected by regular winter fires. We used co-inertia analysis for combining the trait response of 471 invertebrate species (117 001 individuals) and 81 plant species at 23 sites with different fire and cutting histories. Trait response was assessed by calculating the variation in weighted mean traits averaged over the communities and by using mean traits in multivariate analyses. The analysis showed a strong association between plant and animal traits under fire constraints (Monte-Carlo test, p=0.0045). Plants and animal distributions show parallel trends in responses to fire which selects traits relating to persistence (ability to survive), resilience (ability to recover) and mobility. Warmth-demanding insects, herbivores, flying carnivores and pollinators were associated with recent fires, as were annual, ruderal and light-demanding plant species with long flowering duration. Small arthropods feeding on dead wood and those with narrow habitat requirements were associated with low fire frequency and unburnt sites, as were competitive plants with large seeds favoring moist sites. The spatial association between plant and animal traits reflected adaptations that promote survival in the disturbance regime, while the disturbance acts as an environmental filter on the distribution and assemblage of the trait values within communities. This combined analysis of plant and invertebrate traits distributions illustrates how community and ecosystem responses can be monitored and the results generalized across localities and disturbance types. Analyses of traits that cross trophic levels provide powerful and promising tools for validating management procedures and controlling ecosystem functions.

[1]  Bernard Clément,et al.  Identifying functional groups for response to disturbance in an abandoned pasture. , 1998 .

[2]  D. Ackerly,et al.  A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. , 2006, Ecology.

[3]  J. Hodgson.  Commonness and rarity in British butterflies , 1993 .

[4]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Functional Diversity — at the Crossroads between Ecosystem Functioning and Environmental Filters , 2007 .

[5]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Space-for-Time Substitution as an Alternative to Long-Term Studies , 1989 .

[6]  J. Aronson,et al.  Plant functional types: a promising tool for management and restoration of degraded lands , 2003 .

[7]  F. Bello,et al.  Predictive value of plant traits to grazing along a climatic gradient in the Mediterranean , 2005 .

[8]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  The ade4 package - I : One-table methods , 2004 .

[10]  M. Obrist,et al.  Arthropod biodiversity after forest fires: winners and losers in the winter fire regime of the southern Alps , 2004 .

[11]  K. Walker,et al.  Large-scale changes in the abundance of common higher plant species across Britain between 1978, 1990 and 1998 as a consequence of human activity: Tests of hypothesised changes in trait representation , 2005 .

[12]  Daniel G. Milchunas,et al.  Plant trait responses to grazing – a global synthesis , 2007 .

[13]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS IN RELATION TO FIRE IN CROWN-FIRE ECOSYSTEMS , 2004 .

[14]  Jacob McC. Overton,et al.  Shifts in trait‐combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients , 2000 .

[15]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[16]  Josep G. Canadell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World , 2007 .

[17]  G. Likens,et al.  Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives , 1990 .

[18]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[19]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Top predator control of plant biodiversity and productivity in an old‐field ecosystem , 2003 .

[20]  Juli G. Pausas,et al.  A hierarchical deductive approach for functional types in disturbed ecosystems , 2003 .

[21]  M. Westoby,et al.  Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: Is the method of size reduction common among clades? , 2003 .

[22]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  RELATING PLANT TRAITS AND SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS ALONG BIOCLIMATIC GRADIENTS FOR 88 LEUCADENDRON TAXA , 2004 .

[23]  Alain Franc,et al.  Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests , 2000 .

[24]  S. Hurlbert.  Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[25]  J. Siitonen,et al.  Beetle diversity in timberline forests: a comparison between old-growth and regeneration areas in Finnish Lapland , 2002 .

[26]  Garth N. Foster,et al.  Effect of land disturbance and stress on species traits of ground beetle assemblages , 2001 .

[27]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  CO‐INERTIA ANALYSIS AND THE LINKING OF ECOLOGICAL DATA TABLES , 2003 .

[28]  E. Castella,et al.  Patterns of macroinvertebrate traits along three glacial stream continuums , 2006 .

[29]  C. Braak,et al.  Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method , 1996, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[30]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[31]  P. Legendre,et al.  RELATING BEHAVIOR TO HABITAT: SOLUTIONS TO THEFOURTH-CORNER PROBLEM , 1997 .

[32]  Long-term evolution of understorey plant species composition after logging in chestnut coppice stands (Cevennes Mountains, southern France) , 2005 .

[33]  A. Hansen,et al.  VEGETATION DYNAMICS UNDER FIRE EXCLUSION AND LOGGING IN A ROCKY MOUNTAIN WATERSHED, 1856–1996 , 2003 .

[34]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[35]  Mariusz Glabowski,et al.  Long‐Term Evolution , 2010 .

[36]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal , 1996 .

[37]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Trait convergence and trait divergence in herbaceous plant communities: Mechanisms and consequences , 2006 .

[38]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[39]  B. Statzner,et al.  Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an initial assessment of trait patterns in least impacted river reaches , 2005 .

[40]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? , 2007 .

[41]  S. Devin,et al.  Changes in functional biodiversity in an invaded freshwater ecosystem : the Moselle river , 2005 .

[42]  M. Conedera,et al.  Long‐term forest fire ecology and dynamics in southern Switzerland , 1999 .

[43]  D. Bailey,et al.  Functional richness of local hoverfly communities (Diptera, Syrphidae) in response to land use across temperate Europe , 2006, Oikos.

[44]  D. Driscoll,et al.  Beetle Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Depend on Ecological Traits, Habitat Condition, and Remnant Size , 2005 .

[45]  S. Díaz,et al.  Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes , 2001 .

[46]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Predicting the functional response of a farmland bird , 2006 .

[47]  P. Edwards,et al.  The effects of wildfire on ground‐active spiders in deciduous forests on the Swiss southern slope of the Alps , 2008 .

[48]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[49]  Eric Garnier,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION , 2004 .

[50]  S. Dolédec,et al.  Co‐inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species–environment relationships , 1994 .

[51]  M. Obrist,et al.  Biodiversity and resilience of arthropod communities after fire disturbance in temperate forests , 2006, Oecologia.

[52]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale , 1998 .

[53]  Juli G. Pausas,et al.  Inferring differential evolutionary processes of plant persistence traits in Northern Hemisphere Mediterranean fire‐prone ecosystems , 2006 .

[54]  C. Buddle,et al.  Succession of boreal forest spider assemblages following wildfire and harvesting , 2000 .

[55]  J. P. Grime,et al.  SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE SEED BANKS OF HERBACEOUS SPECIES IN TEN CONTRASTING HABITATS , 1979 .

[56]  Sarah S. Greenleaf,et al.  Wild bee species increase tomato production and respond differently to surrounding land use in Northern California , 2006 .

[57]  O. Honnay,et al.  The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors determining the distribution of plants in fragmented riverine forests: an emergent group approach , 2005 .