Memory Practices in the Sciences (review)

on racism, which he outright dismisses, would have lent nuance to his argument and recognition of the many instances of indirect discrimination (or “statistical discrimination,” see Massey 2007) behind the actions and rhetoric of seemingly benevolent government officials. As well, it would have kept his arguments from paralleling the abundant stereotypes about poor immigrants. In other words, borrowing from these approaches would have strengthened his arguments and added much needed complexity to the discussion. This book should be of interest to those who are concerned with issues of immigration, poverty and policy and I recommend it, but always paired with the readings that the author so intensely dismisses.