Reply to: D. Moon and T. Napier-Hemy. Pelvic ureteric junction obstruction: natural history, nephrological considerations and current evidence base for surgical management in poorer functioning kidneys. J Clin Urol 2020; 13: 116–121
暂无分享，去创建一个
[1] D. Moon,et al. Pelvic ureteric junction obstruction: Natural history, nephrological considerations and current evidence base for surgical management in poorer functioning kidneys , 2020, Journal of Clinical Urology.
[2] A. Bhattacharya,et al. Outcome of poorly functioning kidneys secondary to PUJO preserved by pyeloplast. , 2017, Journal of pediatric surgery.
[3] Kazumasa Matsumoto,et al. Improvement in Renal Function and Symptoms of Patients Treated with Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with Less Than 20% Split Renal Function. , 2016, Journal of endourology.
[4] Xiaoyin Xu,et al. Estimation of Split Renal Function With 99mTc-DMSA SPECT: Comparison Between 3D Volumetric Assessment and 2D Coronal Projection Imaging. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5] M. Shehab,et al. Role of ureteric stents in relieving obstruction in patients with obstructive uropathy , 2013, Urology annals.
[6] R. Babu,et al. Pelvis/cortex ratio: an early marker of success following pyeloplasty in children. , 2010, Journal of pediatric urology.