Computation of Axonal Elongations: Towards a New Brain Injury Criterion

Finite element head models are a well-known way to describe the intracerebral mechanical behaviour during a head impact and, hence, to develop diffuse axonal injury (DAI) prediction tools. Owing to the lack of experimental data, the brain model is usually considered as homogeneous and isotropic. This hypothesis is acceptable from a mechanical point of view, but the classical computed metrics are not adequate according to the varying vulnerability of the neurological cells in the brain. The present study aims to show that the brain axonal orientations map provided by diffusion MRI can be combined with the computed strains in order to evaluate axonal elongations. This new metric seems to be more representative of the DAI mechanisms, which are known to be due to axon elongation.

[1]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms , 2003 .

[2]  Claude Tarriere,et al.  Development of a F.E.M. of the human head according to a specific test protocol , 1992 .

[3]  David F. Meaney,et al.  Physical model studies of cortical brain deformation in response to high strain rate inertial loading , 1990 .

[4]  Grace Scott,et al.  Diffuse axonal injury due to nonmissile head injury in humans: An analysis of 45 cases , 1982, Annals of neurology.

[5]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Dynamic viscoelastic shear properties of soft matter by magnetic resonance elastography using a low-field dedicated system , 2006 .

[6]  Ho-Sung Kang,et al.  Three-Dimensional Human Head Finite-Element Model Validation Against Two Experimental Impacts , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  N. Bešenski,et al.  Traumatic injuries: imaging of head injuries , 2002, European Radiology.

[8]  Caroline Deck,et al.  Head injury prediction capability of the HIC, HIP, SIMon and ULP criteria. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  D. Klatt,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of shear wave propagation observed by in vivo magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[10]  P. Hagmann.  From diffusion MRI to brain connectomics , 2005 .

[11]  M A Poca,et al.  Diffuse axonal injury after head trauma. A review. , 2002, Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery.

[12]  J. Povlishock,et al.  The pathobiology of traumatically induced axonal injury in animals and humans: a review of current thoughts. , 1995, Journal of neurotrauma.

[13]  A. Ommaya,et al.  The role of whiplash in cerebral concussion , 1966 .

[14]  Kolita Mendis,et al.  Finite element modeling of the brain to establish diffuse axonal injury criteria. , 1992 .

[15]  Thomas A. Gennarelli,et al.  Pathophysiologic Responses to Rotational and Translational Accelerations of the Head , 1972 .

[16]  Albert I. King,et al.  A limited review of finite element models developed for brain injury biomechanics research , 2003 .

[17]  J. F. Greenleaf,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  The strain dependent pathophysiological consequences of inertial loading on central nervous system tissue , 1990 .

[19]  A. Nahum,et al.  Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact , 1977 .

[20]  King H. Yang,et al.  Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration , 2003 .

[21]  A. Buki,et al.  All roads lead to disconnection? – Traumatic axonal injury revisited , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[22]  L Zhang,et al.  Recent advances in brain injury research: a new human head model development and validation. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[23]  James A. Newman,et al.  A generalized acceleration model for brain injury threshold (GAMBIT) , 1986 .

[24]  A. Manduca,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. , 1995, Science.