An anti-Hick’s effect for exogenous, but not endogenous, saccadic eye movements

Previously, we have shown that the reaction times (RTs) of exogenously generated saccadic eye movements decrease with an increase in the number of response alternatives (Lawrence et al. in J Vis 8(26):1–7, 2008; Lawrence and Gardella in Exp Brain Res 195(3):413–418, 2009). Because this pattern of RTs is in the direction opposite that predicted by Hick (Q J Exp Psychol 4:11–26, 1952), we termed the effect an “anti-Hick’s” effect. In the present study, we examined whether this effect characterizes saccades in general, or only those saccades that are exogenously generated. An anti-Hick’s effect was found for exogenous, but not for endogenous, saccades. These results demonstrate a clear dissociation between exogenously and endogenously generated saccades and place an important constraint on the anti-Hick’s effect.

[1]  S. Heywood,et al.  Structure of the Visual Array and Saccadic Latency: Implications for Oculomotor Control* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Stephen J. Heinen,et al.  Properties of saccades generated as a choice response , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  E. L. Keller,et al.  Behavioral properties of saccades generated as a choice response , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Bonnie M. Lawrence,et al.  Saccades and reaches, behaving differently , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Charles Chubb,et al.  Visually guided, aimed movements can be unaffected by stimulus–response uncertainty , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Lawrence H Snyder,et al.  An anti-Hick's effect in monkey and human saccade reaction times. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[7]  L. E. Longstreth,et al.  Exceptions to Hick's law: explorations with a response duration measure. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  The Magnitude of the Fixation Offset Effect with Endogenously and Exogenously Controlled Saccades , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[10]  R A Abrams,et al.  Fixation point offsets facilitate endogenous saccades , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Robert A. Marino,et al.  The effects of bottom-up target luminance and top-down spatial target predictability on saccadic reaction times , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Leanne Boucher,et al.  Saccades operate in violation of Hick’s law , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[16]  R. Abrams,et al.  Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.