Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] James W Tanaka,et al. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[2] O. Pascalis,et al. Are faces special to infants? An investigation of configural and featural processing for the upper and lower regions of houses in 3- to 7-month-olds , 2013, Visual cognition.
[3] W. Hayward,et al. Face inversion disproportionately disrupts sensitivity to vertical over horizontal changes in eye position. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Steven C. Dakin,et al. Horizontal Information Drives the Behavioral Signatures of Face Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.
[5] Bruno Rossion,et al. Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[6] B. Rossion. Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis. , 2009, Acta psychologica.
[7] G. Yovel,et al. Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[8] James W. Tanaka,et al. Infants' Processing of Featural and Configural Information in the Upper and Lower Halves of the Face. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.
[9] R. Schultz,et al. Specific impairment of face‐processing abilities in children with autism spectrum disorder using the Let's Face It! skills battery , 2008, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.
[10] J. Barton,et al. The effects of face inversion on the perception of long-range and local spatial relations in eye and mouth configuration. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[11] B. Rossion. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[12] Cindy M. Bukach,et al. Preservation of mouth region processing in two cases of prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.
[13] Gillian Rhodes,et al. Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] Claus-Christian Carbon,et al. Face-specific configural processing of relational information. , 2006, British journal of psychology.
[15] M. Riesenhuber,et al. Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape–based model of vision , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[16] N. Kanwisher,et al. Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.
[17] George L. Malcolm,et al. Regional Variation in the Inversion Effect for Faces: Differential Effects for Feature Shape, Feature Configuration, and External Contour , 2004, Perception.
[18] F. Simion,et al. Can a Nonspecific Bias Toward Top-Heavy Patterns Explain Newborns' Face Preference? , 2004, Psychological science.
[19] P. Bennett,et al. Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.
[20] Frédéric Gosselin,et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it's in the eyes , 2004, Cogn. Sci..
[21] Jason J S Barton,et al. Attending to Faces: Change Detection, Familiarization, and Inversion Effects , 2003, Perception.
[22] D. Maurer,et al. The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[23] D. Maurer,et al. Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.
[24] J. Keenan,et al. Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. , 2001, British journal of psychology.
[25] V. Bruce,et al. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .
[26] A. Freire,et al. The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.
[27] V. Bruce,et al. Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[28] G. Rhodes,et al. What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.
[29] M. Farah,et al. Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[30] T. Valentine. Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.
[31] V. Bruce,et al. Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.
[32] J. Sergent. An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.
[33] R. Yin. Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .
[34] David K. A. Barnes,et al. correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.