Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face

[1]  James W Tanaka,et al.  Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[2]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Are faces special to infants? An investigation of configural and featural processing for the upper and lower regions of houses in 3- to 7-month-olds , 2013, Visual cognition.

[3]  W. Hayward,et al.  Face inversion disproportionately disrupts sensitivity to vertical over horizontal changes in eye position. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Horizontal Information Drives the Behavioral Signatures of Face Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[5]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  B. Rossion Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[7]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Infants' Processing of Featural and Configural Information in the Upper and Lower Halves of the Face. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[9]  R. Schultz,et al.  Specific impairment of face‐processing abilities in children with autism spectrum disorder using the Let's Face It! skills battery , 2008, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[10]  J. Barton,et al.  The effects of face inversion on the perception of long-range and local spatial relations in eye and mouth configuration. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  B. Rossion Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[12]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Preservation of mouth region processing in two cases of prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[13]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Face-specific configural processing of relational information. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[15]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape–based model of vision , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[17]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  Regional Variation in the Inversion Effect for Faces: Differential Effects for Feature Shape, Feature Configuration, and External Contour , 2004, Perception.

[18]  F. Simion,et al.  Can a Nonspecific Bias Toward Top-Heavy Patterns Explain Newborns' Face Preference? , 2004, Psychological science.

[19]  P. Bennett,et al.  Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.

[20]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it's in the eyes , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  Attending to Faces: Change Detection, Familiarization, and Inversion Effects , 2003, Perception.

[22]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[24]  J. Keenan,et al.  Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[25]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[26]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[27]  V. Bruce,et al.  Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  G. Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[29]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[30]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[31]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[32]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[33]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[34]  David K. A. Barnes,et al.  correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.