3D photography is a reliable burn wound area assessment tool compared to digital planimetry in very young children.
暂无分享，去创建一个
[1] R. Kimble,et al. A prospective observational study investigating all children presenting to a specialty paediatric burns centre. , 2015, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.
[2] R M Kimble,et al. 3D photography is as accurate as digital planimetry tracing in determining burn wound area. , 2015, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.
[3] R. Ware,et al. Play and heal: randomized controlled trial of Ditto™ intervention efficacy on improving re-epithelialization in pediatric burns. , 2014, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.
[4] R. Kimble,et al. Comparison of three different dressings for partial thickness burns in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial , 2013, Trials.
[5] K. Bogie,et al. Repeatability and clinical utility in stereophotogrammetric measurements of wounds. , 2013, Journal of wound care.
[6] A. Chang,et al. A Comparison of Wound Area Measurement Techniques: Visitrak Versus Photography , 2011, Eplasty.
[7] David G Armstrong,et al. Digital Planimetry Results in More Accurate Wound Measurements: A Comparison to Standard Ruler Measurements , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.