Rhythmic crowd bobbing on a grandstand simulator

Abstract It is widely accepted that concerted human activity such as bouncing or bobbing can excite cantilever grandstands. Crowd coordination can be unwitting and may be exacerbated by structural motion caused by resonant structural response. This is an area of uncertainty in the design and analysis of modern grandstands. This paper presents experimental measurement and analysis of rhythmic crowd bobbing loads obtained from tests on a grandstand simulator with two distinct support conditions; (a) rigid, and; (b) flexible. It was found that significant structural vibration at the bobbing frequency did not increase the effective bobbing load. Structural motion at the bobbing frequency caused a reduction in the dynamic load factor (DLF) at the frequency of the second harmonic while those at the first and third harmonics were unaffected. Two plausible reasons for this are: (a) the bobbing group were unable to supply significant energy to the system at the frequency of the second harmonic; (b) the bobbing group altered their bobbing style to reduce the response of the grandstand simulator. It was deduced that the bobbing group did not absorb energy from the dynamic system. Furthermore, dynamic load factors for groups of test subjects bobbing on a rigid structure were typically greater than those of synthesised groups derived from individuals bobbing alone, possibly due to group effects such as audio and visual stimuli from neighbouring test subjects. Last, the vibration levels experienced by the test subjects appear to be below levels likely to cause discomfort. This is to be expected as the test subjects were themselves controlling the magnitude and duration of vibration for the bobbing tests considered.

[1]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Mathematical models for the apparent masses of standing subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration , 2003 .

[2]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Reproduction and application of human bouncing and jumping forces from visual marker data , 2010 .

[3]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Grandstand Simulator for Dynamic Human-Structure Interaction Experiments , 2010 .

[4]  A. Blakeborough,et al.  Statistical analysis of structural vibrations due to crowd jumping loads , 2008 .

[5]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Experimental study of human-induced dynamic forces due to jumping on a perceptibly moving structure , 2006 .

[6]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Stochastic approach to modelling of near-periodic jumping loads , 2010 .

[7]  Paul Reynolds,et al.  Vibration serviceability of stadia structures subjected to dynamic crowd loads: A literature review , 2011 .

[8]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Experimental study of human-induced dynamic forces due to bouncing on a perceptibly moving structure , 2004 .

[9]  F. R. Miller,et al.  Development of a new long span composite floor system , 2006 .

[10]  A. Blakeborough,et al.  Vibration Perception and Comfort Levels for an Audience Occupying a Grandstand with Perceivable Motion , 2009 .

[11]  P Dallard,et al.  The London Millennium Footbridge , 2001 .

[12]  Paul Reynolds,et al.  Human Jumping and Bobbing Forces on Flexible Structures: Effect of Structural Properties , 2008 .

[13]  Tianjian Ji,et al.  Action of Individual Bouncing on Structures , 2009 .

[14]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR THE APPARENT MASS OF THE SEATED HUMAN BODY EXPOSED TO VERTICAL VIBRATION , 1998 .

[15]  Tianjian Ji,et al.  The frequency ranges of dance-type loads , 2001 .

[16]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Crowd-induced rhythmic loading , 2006 .